--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <noision1@h...> wrote: > I AM REALLY OFFENDED! Oh brother again. Sorry I offened you again. Please lighten up; don't be offended. Forgive this old-timer for trying to get caught up with new uses for old terminology. I can remember when the first polyphonic Moog came out (early '70s). A music store salesman tried to tell me monophonic meant you can play more than one note at a time and polyphonic meant you can play only one note at a time. I still think he had it backwards. Of course, the 1969-1970 generation Moog could have multiple notes sounded simultaneously but only one key at a time on the keyboard could trigger the complex sound. Back then it was called monophonic. Yet, when I sent the output of 2 different envelope generator controlled VCAs through two trunk lines into a two track tape recorder, I had stereo. I suppose it could be called 2 voice non- polyphonic stereo. ;-) And to think, 33 years later each E-Mu layer (that is, each monophonic voice of which my Command Station has 128) has at least a billion times the functionality and complexity of the Moog. Phew! --Steve 8-)
Message
Re: polyphony
2003-06-19 by steve_the_composer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.