--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@y...> wrote: > *NO ONE* that I know of in the ROMpler/sampler world counts layered > presets as one "voice". Stereo sounds use two voices. > Layered sounds use at least one voice per layer. This is not > deceiving on the part of > every synth manufacturer, it's just what the terminology is. > > By the way, I forgot to mention that 12th order filters use 2 voices. When you consider how much bulk E-Mu puts into its manuals and how prominently the "128-voice" capability is promoted, it is absurd that E-Mu doesn't come out and say what other manufacturers have freely admitted. Please show me in which manual or addenda there is any explanation of how anything other than chorus reduces polyphony (number of playable voices). Do the manuals say that stereo samples use two audio streams? Perhaps I missed that. Do the manuals say that 12th order filters use two audio streams? What else eats up audio streams? And where are audio streams explicitly equated with layers? BTW, I am comfortable saying current E-Mu gear has 128 audio streams. Will we also find out that multi-samples also use multiple audio streams--that (for example), an E-Mu instrument [ROM sample] that has 28 drum different samples (a kit) uses 28 audio streams? Why can't E-Mu just do what other manufacturers have done in the past and be up front (as my previous posts from Casio and Roland manuals show)? Read the E-Mu manuals, please: INTRODUCTION: Ultra Powerful Synthesizer "The extremely flexible yet easy to use 4-layer synthesizer voices make it easy . . . ." "128 voice polyphony ensures that you can play and sequence the most complex material." The first sentence clearly refers to a 4-layer structure as a voice. Two sentences later, the reader/user/consumer/potential buyer has no reason to believe that 128 voice polyphony is not 128 4-layer synthesizer voices. It would be very easy to say, "The extremely flexible yet easy to use 4-layer synthesizer presets make it easy . . . ." and "Up to 128 voice polyphony ensures that you can play and sequence the most complex material" or even "E-Mu's unique 128 audio stream architechture ensures that you can create, play and sequence the most complex material." In order to demonstrate that the hype in the intro is not intended to be misleading, it would be nice to see in future manuals and addenda a note referring to a brief section summarizing 128 audio stream architecture as it rleates to layers, number of simultaneous notes that can be triggered, polyphony, etc. E.g., "(See page 12 for an overview of E-Mu's unique 128 audio stream sound engine.)" BTW, how does an E-Mu user know which samples [aka ROM instruments] are stereo and which aren't? Please don't misunderstand, I like the E-Mu architecture and am very pleased with the flexibility it has. In fact on this board and others when users have had problems/complaints, I have been very liberal with my praise of the architecture's flexibility (so much so that when someone asked if the big data knob can be used to send program changes to external gear and someone else said they didn't think so, I wrote a utility pattern that demonstrated two ways that it could be done.) Also, having worked with real patchcords extensively on the original Moog, I appreciate E-Mu's virtual patchcord architecture, terminology, and flexibility. I have openly praised them when others have questioned them, and I have created sample patchcord solutions to posted problems to show how flexible they are. However, I did not like finding out after several months that I do not have an "Ultra Powerful Synthesizer" with 128 4-layer voices and I certainly did not appreciate the way in which I found this out. > *NO ONE* that I know of in the ROMpler/sampler world counts layered > presets as one "voice". Huh? "The extremely flexible yet easy to use 4-layer synthesizer voices make it easy . . . ." E-Mu clealy refers to "4-layer synthesizer voices." The gear has 4- layer presets. [presets = voices] Thus, in every introuduction of every manual that has this line E-Mu is counting a 4-layer preset as a 4-layer voice. If other manufacturers also equate the number of layers with polyphony (number of triggerable voices) without describing how the architecture uses, reduces, chews ups, eats, robs, etc. voices/polyphony, I would also claim they should improve their manuals. 8-) Steve
Message
Re: polyphony
2003-06-19 by steve_the_composer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.