> Sample-players haven't used variable-rate playback for well over a > decade at this point. E-mu, among others, uses a fixed clock with > sample interpolation in order to shift the pitch of the sample in > question. I think there's a confusion of terminology here. If a sample played back at a higher frequency is shorter, then I was calling it variable-rate playback (even if the clock frequency is fixed). I was using the term "pitch-shifting" to refer to transformation of the pitch without affecting the (apparent) playback rate. I suppose we're getting to the stage where the two techniques are starting to overlap... -- nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com
Message
Re: [xl7] Sample Reverse, Loop, etc.
2003-04-30 by Nick Rothwell