I've used nuendo before, and now Cubase SX. I might want to try to switch to nuendo, but still not sure. Post production stage of things sounds interesting. We'll see what happens ----- Original Message ----- From: <erik_magrini@...> To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: Re: [xl7] Slotools > The thing that keeps PT a mainstay is the portability. > > >>>I'd say the biggest draw is Stability, though I can see what you're > saying too. <<< > > I'm a faithful cubase user... Anyone know of Neundo is that much better? > > >>>Nuendo is more or less SX with a lot of additional post-production > features added, as well as much more surround sound support. Nuendo 2 > (due out any day now) will have a lot more features compared to SX, but > only until SX 2 comes out later this year. Then the two programs will be > more or less comparable as they are now. If you're happy with SX/SL, then > switching to Nuendo really won't get you anything unless you're doing > sound to picture work, or other post-intensive operations. > > rEalm(SX user all the way) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [xl7] Slotools
2003-04-16 by David
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.