Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "David" <spec@s...> wrote:
> The thing that keeps PT a mainstay is the portability.  Every 
studio has to
> have it so that they can transport to other studios.  Most studios 
these
> days are using logic, but mix in protools... or somthing like 
that...
> 

Or you can just dub waves out to separate tracks.

Or, if you are working with Video editors who need protools files, 
you can download slotools Free, and prep your dubbed waves there. (I 
hear there is a 32 track version of it available from, uhh, various 
sources)

Unless you are a doing this for all day, and not only that but 
spending a great deal of time commuting to different studios, I don't 
see how the portability matches out the usability factor. 

> I'm a faithful cubase user...  Anyone know of Neundo is that much 
better?
> 

At first perusal, Cubase SX and Nuendo seem to be indentical, apart 
from the Nuendo surround stuff and the Cubase midi channels. I could 
be wrong though - I don't have Nuendo, and have only played with it 
at a friends.

bIz


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <erik_magrini@B...>
> To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 1:53 PM
> Subject: [xl7] Slotools
> 
> 
> > Yeah, I just read the review of PT6 in Sound On Sound, and it was 
about as
> > boring as you can get for a software sequencer.  Some of the "new"
> > features just floored me.  I mean, you couldn't undo midi 
quantization
> > changes until now?  Icky, icky, icky!  :)
> >
> > rEalm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Stay away from slotools... stay away.... It's still the worlds 
most
> > expensive and cumbersome pile of crap.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >