The thing that keeps PT a mainstay is the portability. Every studio has to have it so that they can transport to other studios. Most studios these days are using logic, but mix in protools... or somthing like that... I'm a faithful cubase user... Anyone know of Neundo is that much better? ----- Original Message ----- From: <erik_magrini@...> To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com> Cc: <xl7@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 1:53 PM Subject: [xl7] Slotools > Yeah, I just read the review of PT6 in Sound On Sound, and it was about as > boring as you can get for a software sequencer. Some of the "new" > features just floored me. I mean, you couldn't undo midi quantization > changes until now? Icky, icky, icky! :) > > rEalm > > > > > Stay away from slotools... stay away.... It's still the worlds most > expensive and cumbersome pile of crap. > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [xl7] Slotools
2003-04-16 by David
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.