Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

I took a very quick look at this after reading rEalms reply to you.  
And it seemed that when i was using one of the ARP: presets there 
was no disappearing arp problem!  I guess that this is due to the 
arp being saved with the preset but I am not totaly sure about 
that.  I don't know if there is any other difference between the 
patches.

I bet we will get you sorted out pretty soon :)

Mike G.

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "soundcrafter" <aurastar@c...> wrote:
> I'm still beating my head against the wall on this one... I've 
> flipped thru the manuals I have, I've tried various settings in 
the 
> master and preset arp menus, different methods of triggering, and 
I 
> still get the same result. 
> 
> Before I d/led 1.32 it would happen *anytime* I switched tracks, 
but 
> now it only happens if I have the track with the arp selected, 
then 
> change to a different one. Even if I just go *by* it (using the 
data 
> wheel or track select buttons) on the way to some other track, it 
> goes out.
> 
> Realm, you said this doesn't happen on your machine...  So am I 
the 
> only one who's running into this or what?  When I'm just playing 
out 
> at home, it's a little annoying, but not really a big deal.  But 
in a 
> recording or live play situation it's not too cool.
> 
> I'm sure I'm missing something, but I just can't figure out *what*
> Any suggestions you can offer would be appreciated :)
> 
> --snip--
> If I have a arpeggiated preset playing on a track with that track 
> selected, then I switch to a different track in mid-pattern, the 
> track with the arp goes silent until the pattern loops back to the 
> beginning.
> 
> All my arps are set up as part of the preset... I wasn't even 
> aware you could set up an arp in the pattern edit screens.
> 
> Maybe it has something to do with the way I trigger it... I go 
into 
> step record, put in a single note where I want the arp to begin, 
then 
> go into the Pattern edit menu and use the NOTE function to 
lengthen 
> the note so the arp plays for the length of the pattern. Should I 
be 
> using a different approach here?
> --snip--