Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

I have to agree with ya here I feel that the filters are stronger on 
my E5000.  I dont know what the real deal is there but they just 
seem to have more depth to them.  I am not shur if that is just me 
or what but that is the way it seems to me.

I only use maby 4 of the filters on the Xl7. 

i would like to hear from arron on this one is this the way it is or 
am i hearing things?

Peace 

Mike G.

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "sigalarm <bruce@s...>" <bruce@s...> 
wrote:
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "David" <spec@s...> wrote:
> 
> > better than the EMU.  EMU has the advantage of the filters.  The 
best
> > filters in the industry are in the xx-7's.   The 909 may look 
like it 
> 
> As an owner of an XL-7 and and Ultra 4, I can say that your 
opinions
> on filters are a bit strange.  The XL-7 filters are barely 
passable,
> and for some needs very sad.
> 
> I love my XL-7 but its rather weak filters (no ability to change
> resonance after note on, questionable cutoff curves, etc) are the
> thing I would most like to see changed.  You want to talk about old
> technology?  The filters in the XL-7 are no better than the ones 
they
> shipped on the Ultra Protues / Morpheus in what, 92?  Not even as 
good
> if you take into account that there are fewer filter types.
> 
> I love my XL-7 to death, but its filters are a joke.  If I need a
> sound that if filtered, I don't use the XL.
> 
> The E-4 Ultra filters are much better.
> 
> Bruce