--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "David" <spec@s...> wrote: > better than the EMU. EMU has the advantage of the filters. The best > filters in the industry are in the xx-7's. The 909 may look like it As an owner of an XL-7 and and Ultra 4, I can say that your opinions on filters are a bit strange. The XL-7 filters are barely passable, and for some needs very sad. I love my XL-7 but its rather weak filters (no ability to change resonance after note on, questionable cutoff curves, etc) are the thing I would most like to see changed. You want to talk about old technology? The filters in the XL-7 are no better than the ones they shipped on the Ultra Protues / Morpheus in what, 92? Not even as good if you take into account that there are fewer filter types. I love my XL-7 to death, but its filters are a joke. If I need a sound that if filtered, I don't use the XL. The E-4 Ultra filters are much better. Bruce
Message
Re: MC-909 and the MP-7
2003-01-24 by sigalarm <bruce@sigalarm.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.