On 1/9/03 3:39 PM, "Aaron Eppolito" <synthesis77@...> wrote: > Yeah, that was the idea of using text events. Since there's no > standard on how pattern chaining should be expressed in a Standard MIDI > File (despite some work being done by the SMF Looping/Branching Working > Group), I chose text events so they could be edited in most any > sequencer and hopefully not be stripped out like a sequencer specific > message. Aaron I was surprised by the statement about pattern chaining in an SMF, not because I know different (I don't) but because I was under the assumption that the whole reason Dave Oppenheim pushed for the Type-2 SMF format was to allow subsequences, which in my mind always included the simpler case of a bunch of chained sequences. Are we both right because type-2 was not an option to use because it was not ever widely implemented (was it ever implemented outside of Opcode's Studio Vision?)? Sorry for the spurious interrupt. The subject is probably not of much interest to anyone else. Just my curiosity. drk www.delora.com/music www.mp3.com/zdrk drk.iuma.com
Message
Re: [xl7] Stop step
2003-01-09 by drK
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.