Well Emu can certainly defend themselves, but it may be helpful to understand that the filters Emu uses were(are?) quite innovative for digital filters, though when compared against today's world of VA type filters they seem inadequate. What Emu "invented" with the Morpheus concept was the ability to make a filter that could be changed from one type to another in real-time. So you could have some pretty twisted filtering characteristics, far beyond the tradition sweep the cutoff frequency limitation. But this approach to filter implimentation has a limit in that only one parameter can be varied in realtime. Now this parameter can cause quite complex things, including changing multiple traditional filter parameters - things like sweepin frequency while changing bnandwidth. But you only get to "morph" in one dimension at a time. So a tradition synth filter, like a 4 pole lowpass can have real time adjust of cutoff but not resonance. The work around is that in an instrument like the P2K architecture, since it supports truly dynamic voice allocation and is multitimbral, you can switch filter types on the fly from note to note. So to change Q is really replacing one filter with a slight variation with the Q increased or decreased. This is why resonance is usually a note-time only adjustment. I do seem to recall at some point either my Audity 2K or Ultra having a filter where Q was not fixed at note time, but I could be mistaken. BTW, the above explaination is what I have sussed out of the Emu information and products I have owned over the years. So it could be incorrect, especially in the details. But this is my understanding of why the filters are as they are. Should Emu change this? That's another question entirely. Its a tradeoff really. Is it better to have a few traditional filters that behave "normal", or to have the flexibility of filter types. Also, Emu has quite a few morphing filters in their archives. They could well add new ones to the XL7/MP7. Which leads me to a question: why isn't the famous "BatPhaser" filter in the XL7/MP7? drK
Message
Re: Q (was "anyone?")
2001-11-01 by drk@delora.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.