Another option could be to utilize the USB port to a zip drive. Then you could dump or access samples similiar to AKAI units. It would be a failry cheap solution as far as gear goes as well. Not mention it doesn't add much more weight or take a lot of real estate when lugging around and setting up gear. Just a thought, -Greg --- Neila Eliphas Spare <neilaworking@...> wrote: > Well, with all the talk in regard to the possibility > of being able to burn roms within the native > enviroment of the Command Station itself, I figured > I'd throw out a couple of thoughts. I'll first > state that I still don't completely realize how this > can be done. > > With the MC-909 looming on the horizon, it would > look as if arguably the ultimate self-contained > workstation to date may be months away.......or is > it. Well, in regards to serving as a controller and > in regards to serving as a sequencer, the Command > Stations seem to (IMO) beat out the beast known as a > 909. In regard to being a synth, I actually think > the Command Stations edge out. The one REALLY big > thing that seperates the MC-909 (as well as the > RS-7000) really comes down to > sampling.....everything else really being small > potatos. Now though, EMU may have a very very very > VERY slick trick up their sleave. Again, assuming > the Command Station has the capability to burn Roms > within it's own native enviroment, things take a > very big turn. > > "So the Command Station can burn Roms, so what? All > this primarily does is give me a means to extended > memory in regards to how many patches I can save." > This thinking may not exactly be correct. One > really cool thing we have to remember is that the > Command Stations have a means of interacting with > the computer enviroment aside from MIDI. Granted, > the USB features haven't really been utilized at > this point at all, but they exist none the less. > Now, as I'm sure everyone realizes, the computer > enviroment can be pretty darn capable in regards to > being a sampler enviroment (in regard to grabbing > and editing samples). Since this is the case, lets > go ahead and assume we have some new features added > to the E-loader program, chiefly, one that enables > E-loader to import .wav, .aiff, or someother type of > sample format. Once a waveform(s) is imported into > E-loader, E-loader is then able to export the > sample(s) out to the Command Station via > USB....these new waveforms can then either be saved > on to ones on Rom chip in a Command Station, or > saved directly into the Command Station itself. No, > this doesn't bring us into the realm of the Command > Station having sampling ability, but it brings us > pretty darn close to that point; not to forget > mention that it REALLY opens up doors in regards to > waveforms we have to work with within the Command > Station. > > Moving away from the idea of burning roms now, lets > assume that a couple of the more easy to implement > revamps in the OS occur. Things like being able to > bounce patches used in a currently playing pattern > back to their orginal state on the fly, being able > to record mutes/unmutes into a pattern/song, being > able to swap specific parts/tracks of a pattern with > that of a differing pattern on the fly (mega-mix > type feature), being able to jump control to any > specific track using only a couple button/knob > movements, etc. > > Really what we start to look at here is something > that comes VERY VERY VERY VERY close to matching the > MC-909 in capability. Furthermore, with the given > cost of the Command Stations, throwing in features > like this capably puts Roland into a REALLY damn > iffy position. When you consider the fact that the > MC-909 is planned to debut at a cost that is about > twice that of the Command Stations, I'm sure the > those in the market would really think hard on how > badly they wanted to purchase the MC-909 over the > Command Station which nearly matched the 909 in > capability.....undoubtely, in some areas (as a > controller and sequencer), it would out do the 909 > (conversly the 909 would still hold some tricks over > the Command Station as well). Such a case could > really work in not just EMU's favor, but in the > shoppers favor as well. Sales of Command Stations > might see a sudden boost, conversely the cost of the > 909 may have to be dropped a lot more quickly than > normal in order to steer shoppers eyes back on to it > and away from the Command Stations. In all honesty, > I don't expect this scenario to occur, BUT I'll be > more than happy if it actually does play out. EMU > would have pulled off quite a bit of marketing > genius if this does occur, and more so, all of us > would have ended up with a lot more than we > (probably) expected when we purchased our Command > Stations. > > Respects, > > Aaron Nesby > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
Message
Re: [xl7] Command Station, the way of the future?
2002-10-24 by Greg Oler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.