Sorry Bohemian, I have to reply again: The MC505 is hardly mono, has 64 voices not 8 and has a lot on the XL7 already, read the archives here. This is not to say the XL7 is not great. That is why I have one! *If* the MC909 is better than the MC505 by a long shot: expansion ports, tons of knobs and sliders, sampling, and the HUGE (a la triton/fantom) display, well then it may certainly kick the ass of anything around right now. --- In xl7@y..., "bohemian_grooove" <justin@i...> wrote: > YAY! another mono 8 voice synth from Roland that takes a tech writing > masters degree to decipher the manual and an engineering degree to > navigate. aside from sampling...it prolly ain't got nothin on the > E-MU. my last main synth was an XP-50 i've owned since 96. after 6 > long years i was just beginning to figure out how it all worked when i > noticed last july i could get an XL-7 from mars music for $750 - $200 > rebate from E-MU (yes..$550 =) . after a couple hours of using the > thing i wanted to kick myself in the ass for not buying an E-MU > sooner. writing experimental music and manipulating sounds has ceased > to become a chore. now i'm ACTUALLY having fun in my home studio. and > being 80% more productive. imagine that! a synth that's monsterously > powerful AND fun to use. thanks E-MU!
Message
Re: Shots of the new Roland MC909
2002-09-19 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.