I'd like to add me two cents... I've used just about everythign out there also, and I have found Sonar the best by far. I do real-time recording almost exclusively, and Sonar has a very tight clock. The SonarFX are quite good too. It can easily be used as a final step, mastering device also. Good Luck !! -payntar --- In xl7@y..., "joesapo" <joesapo@y...> wrote: > Just to add to the confusion, I'm gonna recommend Sonar. I've tried > almost all of the sequencers out there, and Sonar has the best MIDI > implimentation in my opinion. I tend to get the foundation beat set > up in Sonar, where I can use groove quantizing and nifty stuff like > that on a beat, and then record it into my command station. After > I've got a few measures uploaded I usually just cut and paste the > measures using the hardware. Also, since multi-channel recording > doesn't work right *yet* in grid record mode, this lets me get around > playing in real-time, which I suck at. > > sapo > > --- In xl7@y..., "Jean Kergutuil" <jean.kergutuil@a...> wrote: > > What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare > sequence > > with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ?? > > Thanks
Message
Re: CUBASE SX
2002-09-17 by payntaraspen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.