I agree that the major manufacturer's are definately over-flooding the market with 'new' gear that generally includes misc. and minor 'upgrades' to the previous "new gear", alot of which never seems to be FULLY finished in terms of the programming aspect of it (yamaha particularily comes to mind), before it's dropped all together and they're once again onto the "next" new thing. >>>I think Roland and Yamaha both are also guilty of making gear that is too dumbed down to be of much use beyond the initial learning stages. I'll use Roland as an example here, in that they first came out with the mc303. To their suprise (everyone's really), they sold boatloads more than they planned, an in response to lots of user requests, came out with a more proper version, the mc505 a couple years later. After this though, they stopped IMPROVING on that base, and instead began releasing cutdown versions based on the same technology. So you got the mc307, the dr202, SH32 etc. Same with the sp808 range, it got better one version after the initial release, then they scale back and focus on releasing products based on the same technology, but with LESS features (CDX, sp505, etc)! It's frustrating to me, in that the larger companies seem to think that just because you are into ELECTRONIC music, you can't figure out a piece of gear, or will never use it in a pro-oriented situation. Suddenly if you're a DJ and you write music, you have to use gear that looks like Sesame Street exploded (sorry Emu guys!), and has a cut down feature set, because you're not smart enough to use a 'real' sampler, sequencer, or synth. Bummer! <<< Not that any of this bothers me, I'm a firm believer in the diversified effects of variety in musical applications, and I would prefer that some of the major manufactures take there time for once to design some more advanced and completely different forms of musical ingenuity...not more 'groove box this, analog modeling that'. >>>Exactly my point my man! Just because we make our music differently, doesn't mean we're any less skilled or versed in music technology and the skills involved with that. The funny thing is, it's probably the opposite as I wager electronic musicians releasing their own tunes are responsible not only for writing and creating, but producing, recording, even mastering it all themselves!<<< Word... >>>Word squared. <<< rEalm
Message
Emu (e-music) situation
2002-08-05 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.