Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Archive for xl7.

Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:19 UTC

Message

Re: [xl7] Re: Programmable ROMs?

2015-03-30 by Jon K. Carroll

the ‘analog� madness’? you mean the prices� on working vintage analogs? yes, it is the same kind of thing. There are a limited number of them, there were only X number made, and the supply that is available is what we have.
a better parable, if you prefer, is that an E-MU Emulator II is going UP in price. For the same reasons: electronics fail, and the cheaper the components used in them, the more likely they are to fail. Unlike the 80s E-Mu samplers, the Command Stations and Proteus 2000 series weren't made in the U.S. from Japanese components- they were made in Singapore from Chinese and Singapore(an?) components,� and then those sub-assemblies were shipped to the US and assembled here. voilà! Made in the USA. (Several other ‘made in the USA’ electronic instrument manufacturers do the same kind of thing, as well as at least one of the ‘made in EU ones)
You want inexpensive items? you end up with cheap components. And you cross your fingers and hope that the vendor doing your sub-assemblies didn’t cheap out on your encoders to make a better profit.
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 12:44 AM
To: xl7
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: Programmable ROMs?
�;

Just my two cents:
2015-03-30 3:16 GMT+02:00 D F Tweedie bienpegaito@... [xl7] <xl7@yahoogroups.com>:
Not crazy ... just supply and demand. And it goes to show the timeless value of good hardware technology.
The supply is quite scarce here, and mostly due to the fact, that when those ROMs (and the instruments they were built into) showed up, they were rather overpriced - just look at their prices after few years, or even now. Thus market didn't respond well, and the development of a good hardware technology got thwarted. The truth is, that Phatt & Xtreme ROMs are cheap not because of their samples' quality, but because of their popularity.

Crazy prices kept quoted may result in people not willing to sell their not-used anymore ROMs for less than certain unrealistic price. One day I managed to score a PK-6 with the new Composer, both Orchestrals and Vintage for 200 EUR. I would not pay more than 150EUR for a ROM, even for Vintage or Holy Grail, because it's the same craziness, which fuels the analog madness.

However, I'm thinking of a small database (shared document?), where people could quote the prices they paid and they would be willing to pay for particular ROMs. The results could be surprising...
How much are Stradavari going for these days?
Who cares? They are not compatible with E-mu ROMs anyway ;-)

Seriously though - while I appreciate your parable, you can't compare those. You could have easily scaled up the production line of ROMs: once you're done with designing a platform & the ROM, you only have to make one-per-ROM effort to collect the samples and make the presets (and some of users can confirm, that some samples and the presets are duplicated in different ROMs), and then you can really go and multiply. You can't do the same with hand-made violins, since the time & effort are linear here.

Having said this, I admit it might have been that E-mu never actually reached the level of assumed profitability, so scaling up could not happen.

But there's also another difference: most Stradivari were 300 years old, when E-mu started to produce P2K. They will keep playing for years, if well maintained. Our E-mu boxes won't, they already suffer from jumping dials, broken PSUs and so on. On the other hand, violin is a just a wooden box with a stick and four strings; E-mu instruments are complex mixtures of hardware and software. Most of us, apart from using them in the creative process of making music, treat them like the works of art, and - even though they are deemed to be ephemeral - they certainly deserve it, but let's not get too far ;-)
Bruno

Attachments