Ah just found your flash rom images from 2010: Yahoo! Groups Yahoo! Groups Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content. View on groups.yahoo.com Preview by Yahoo On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:40 PM, "Jack Pratt woodsworth1@... [xl7]" <xl7@yahoogroups.com> wrote: On the board I have designed there is a SDRAM part. This is because the micro I selected supports SDRAM and having the SDRAM could speed up USB transfers and writing to the FLASH memory. It was not for the P2K hardware to access. At the moment I am really annoyed at atmel because the upgrade of the firmware in my JTAGICE3 'succeeded' but has turned it into a brick which the computer can not recognise. This is stopping me from dumping the contents of a ROM SIMM which will tell what the image looks like. If I can figure out what people really want in a FLASH SIMM then perhaps I can work further on this project... ________________________________ From: "janoch23@yahoo.se [xl7]" <xl7@yahoogroups.com> To: xl7@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2014 7:19 AM Subject: Re: [xl7] Any interest remaining in a self-programming FLASH SIMM? Ok, an old post of yours mention DRAM. Was hoping maybe you had figured out some clever scheme to squeeze in refresh cycles while the P2k was busy doing other things. Anyway, are you back to working on this? Can we help in any way to make it happen, such as donating money? ---In xl7@yahoogroups.com, <woodsworth1@...> wrote : It would be too expensive to provide 32MB of SRAM, even VSRAM to simulate a single slot. It is better to have FLASH memory which is reprogrammed by the microcontroller on cue. (either from an SD card under the appropriate circumstances or via USB).
Message
Re: [xl7] Any interest remaining in a self-programming FLASH SIMM?
2014-07-17 by Andre Lewis