BTW, is the pin-out of those SIMM modules documented anywhere? Any reverse engineering results available? -- Przemek On 16/07/14 04:58, Jack Pratt woodsworth1@... [xl7] wrote: > > The SIMMs are parallel (address mapped) interfaces. Providing a SD > card socket is only useful if you provide hardware to convert the SD > card (serial) contents into a compatible parallel format. It seems > easier to just provide a USB interface and program the SIMM via a > computer. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* "'Jon Carroll' joncarroll@... [xl7]" > <xl7@yahoogroups.com> > *To:* xl7@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 July 2014 12:33 PM > *Subject:* Re: [xl7] Any interest remaining in a self-programming > FLASH SIMM? > > > didn't the flash rom use a serial I/O to read the flash? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Pratt woodsworth1@... [xl7]" <xl7@yahoogroups.com> > To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 5:07 PM > Subject: Re: [xl7] Any interest remaining in a self-programming FLASH > SIMM? > > the problem with the SD card is that the chips on the P2K can not > inherently > read it. So there would need to be some conversion from the SD card > format > to the memory mapped format used by the P2K. Of course if you put a > micro on > the board it could read from the SD card and rewrite FLASH as > appropriate. > Again you could use a special preset (accessing certain memory > locations in > the address map) to get the micro to copy one of any different ROM images > into the FLASH based on which key is pressed. To let the user know > when the > copy is complete the "SIMM' could generate a stream of silence until the > operation is over then produce a beep of some sort (if you are still > holding > the key down). If the new image(s) involve different presets/riffs etc > then > you would need to restart the P2K (because it only reads that > information at > startup). > > but is this any better than doing it over USB? > > You certainly wouldn't want to have the module opened to change the SD > card > all the time, and having a USB cable hanging out a hole seems an easy > solution. > > I believe that the preset ROM holds information that looks like the sysex > infomation. Additionally I think that the wave ROM holds information that > looks similar to the disk format of the E4/ultra series. > > I am in the middle of writing software to dump the contents of a ROM > SIMM so > we can know for sure... will take a day or so. > > ! > > ________________________________ > From: "janoch23@... [xl7]" <xl7@yahoogroups.com> > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, 15 July 2014 7:36 PM > Subject: Re: [xl7] Any interest remaining in a self-programming FLASH > SIMM? > > I only suggested dynamically modified samples, half jokingly, to get > "global > single-lfo rectangular pwm" and true noise say at waveforms #126 and > #127. > However, with 128 MB of sample ROM, you are much better off simply using > samples for those, and not worrying about some clever scheme in the > address > decoder. > > With regards to the micro on the SIMM, I think the other view is that > having > an SD card slot and figuring out the data format would be more useful > since > SD cards are cheap and abundant, and you'd have automatic > compatibility with > all kinds of PC operating systems via the ubiquitous card reader. This > view > doesn't really hold though because you'd be forced to open up your p2k > / cs > every time to pull out the SD card. > > Personally I'd also worry that figuring out the data format is not > simple at > all and you'd risk having the project die out while people spend years > trying to reverse engineer it, never fully figuring out every detail. > > With your (Jack Pratt's) design at least everybody could duplicate > existing > ROMs and have something very useful "out of the box". Seeing how > designing a > large waveset is no mean feat, that would probably be the most useful. > > ---In xl7@yahoogroups.com, <woodsworth1@...> wrote : > > The best way to do this (IMO) is to have a micro on the SIMM that will > allow > the FLASH to be 'reprogrammed' via USB. With appropriate software any > image > (existing or composed) could be transferred to the SIMM. > > Finally the logic device can be used to provide access to on-the-fly > sounds. > However there are plenty of limitations to this. > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > > >
Message
Re: [xl7] Any interest remaining in a self-programming FLASH SIMM?
2014-07-16 by Przemysław Węgrzyn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.