I am confused by your posts. Are you trying to offer help to someone else who asked a question or is trying to solve a problem, or are you wanting to do something yourself--such as create a sysex editor? If its the latter and you are an experienced Synthedit developer, I would encourage you to look at the E-Mu Proteus Sysex Manual. You don't need a workaround because its already possible as part of the sysex design. (To me workarounds are needed when something cannot be done using ordinary methods.) As for creating a sysex editor with Ctrlr, I would encourage you and others to create panels to do things that go beyond simple preset editing. As for Synthedit, I played with it a few years ago, but have not kept up with the newer versions. I don't know if someone has modules that could take advantage of E-Mu's 2-way sysex communication. I thought of Synthedit more as audio software than midi software--although I did create a plug-in that would display midi data from E-Mus in 16 separate windows, one for each channel. (I believe I posted a screen shot of it either in Files or Photos.) I hope this answers your question. Steve --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Julius @ Wikter" <wikter@...> wrote: > > Well, then maybe could be possible to do a workaround avoiding those > checksums and use not only Ctrlr, but also Synthedit to create a decent > sysex editor for our CS. Isn't it? > Synthedit is really easy to program. > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Julius @ Wikter" <wikter@...> wrote: > > The problem to edit Emu sysex is the way they use 2 comlement and checksums > to send messages. It.s truly shit. > Theres easier hardware to control using sysex. >
Message
Re: CTRLR.ORG
2013-09-14 by steve_the_composer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.