Yes, I took it as a bombastic aside. As ignorant as I am of sysex, it may well be true for all I know. DF CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. ________________________________ From: steve_the_composer <smw-mail@...> To: xl7@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 11:58 AM Subject: [xl7] Re: CTRLR.ORG My mistake. I thought there was a question implied. Oh well. Steve --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Matt <somatt@...> wrote: > > I don't hear a question. > On Aug 29, 2013 12:45 PM, "Julius @ Wikter" <wikter@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > The problem to edit Emu sysex is the way they use 2 comlement and > > checksums to send messages. It.s truly shit. > > Theres easier hardware to control using sysex. > > > > >
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: CTRLR.ORG
2013-08-31 by D F Tweedie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.