This is an interesting thread, but I am confused when you say that gate controlling gate is a bummer. What are you trying to do or not do? It almost seems like you are saying that when a note is triggered, you don't want it to make a sound, but this doesn't make sense to me. Thanks. Steve --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "bonzai2050" <bonzai2050@...> wrote: > > Well I just gave it another shot. This time building the entire patch from scratch with only the most necessary patchcords. > > Gate wasn't routed to anything, almost everything was 'off'. Still it was controlling the Gate. > > They are just 16th notes btw. Unless I'm doing something wrong or missing something, it seems that you can't stop Gate from controlling Gate. > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Bruno <brunorc@> wrote: > > > > Just from top of my head: > > > > 2012/6/10 bonzai2050 <bonzai2050@>: > > > Also... although you can assign Gate to control whatever you want, it still seems to control the Gate as well. That's a bit of a bummer. > > > > Have you tried searching for a patchcord that binds those to > > disconnect it exactly in the same way as below: > > > > > Velocity works perfectly though after you disable the Vel->Amp patch. > > > > The whole thread seems interesting. I have AN1x which features a real > > step sequencer, but hadn't time yet to dig it. > > > > Bruno > > >
Message
Re: CC's step sequencer
2012-06-10 by steve_the_composer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.