Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/message/13650

I think this is what I was remembering. Don't think he ever posted the other formula.

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "steve_the_composer" <smw-mail@...> wrote:
>
> Its been a while, but I seem to recall trying to basically "map" beats variations. I seem to recall that with CCs (and a baseline patchcord configuration) you can determine which set of beats trigers will be on. I am guessing that the more sources routed to these features, the less control you will have when you send CCs to get the triggers you want.
> 
> (Hope this is right--its been a while and I am a little foggy-headed today.)
> 
> I think aaron may have given the formula or at least talked about it for the beats controls. I seem to remember some modulo was in there.  I will take a look in the message archives.
> 
> Steve 
> 
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Bruno <brunorc@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > since AFAIK there are some (ex-?) E-mu folks on the list, I'd like to
> > ask a question: why such an awesome stuff like beats was made read
> > only? I'd like to have the "busy/variation" type control over the
> > patterns as well... it could be possible (with some external MIDI
> > processing) if I was able to control on/off status of the pattern
> > parts using the SysEx. I just skimmed the SysEx specs, but nothing
> > obvious came up. Weren't there a similar question posted not so long
> > ago in the context of some Kenton controller?
> > 
> > Gettting back to household chores,
> > 
> > Bruno
> >
>