My own experience is that when you move to that kind of software, the control/command structures expand greatly, but nobody wants to tweak little bits of the math in the FFT section of the PD audio realm (at least I certainly don't).
So- my use is more on the control side, which means I need a very capable sound-renderer, which is why I'm on this list :)
Re visuals, PD isn't well suited for anything beyond "basics"- I've created art installations in Max/MSP and then redid them in PD because I thought it would be "cleaner", but it's not. Every kind of visual programming environment like that seems to suffer from a "difficulty of recursion problem", and Jitter (companion to Max/MSP is very capable) (but Mac-only)- by comparison the PD visual packages (Framestein and GEM) are immature.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:14 PM, James Ulibarri <jamesulibarri@...> wrote:
oh wow. i want to learn pure data so bad for audio reactive visuals.
such as..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0Mvj024I-0&feature=related
you're way ahead of the game than 97.9% of people on here..On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Scott Solmonson <scosol@...> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:10 PM, James Ulibarri <jamesulibarri@...> wrote:--anyone running a CS with MAX/MSP? that would be kinda sickFor algorithmic or generational stuff I run everything with Max/MSP, or Puredata depending on my mood/OS.For live interaction, no.
NUNQUAM NON PARATUS
--
NUNQUAM NON PARATUS
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.