The electribes DO have LFO's with selectable waveshapes, and swing. Yes, it is limited, but it's fast and fun, and can sound great with some work. A lot depends a lot on the style of music you are making and how much hands-on you want. I have a Korg esx-1 and it compliments the CS nicely. It can be used as a sound module sequenced from the CS, with all the associated benefits, and they do respond to velocity from midi-in. Load-up your samples and you have an enormous amount of hands-on control straight away. Fast, and great fun. You can still use it's crappy sequencer to lay-down motion sequences. This guy seems to sequence all his flash gear from an esx - with pretty decent results - http://www.youtube.com/user/muzik4machines You can even bus a CS stereo output into the electribe and go haywire on it. Oh, and that little arpeggiator strip is really nice - it even sends midi out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DzHBhPrxhJo More than the sum of it's parts. I'm sure the ASRx is nice too (but where are all the knobs?) :) --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, James Ulibarri <jamesulibarri@...> wrote: > > Matt, > > dude.. you already know my thoughts on the korg electribes and ensoniq > stuff. honestly if i saw someone at a gig and i saw them with an electribe > performing i would be like "wuss!". total cheese, dude. first of all the > sequencer blows on the es-1. no swing, and no quantization, no shuffle. > not sure if you're using any of those facilities but that's a big no no for > me. how boring sounding. plus no real filters or LFO's. big deal if it > says "filter". gee thanks. what kind of filter? lp/bp/hp at the very > minimum let alone all the esoteric types in between must be implemented. no > LFO's and no selectable waveshapes for those LFO's for the filter, pitch, > etc. the ASR-X would allow you individual outs too if you bought the 8 > output board. you can add a scsi board too for $100 from thesoniq.com > also the electribe effects are absolute cheese. that's not an effect > engine... not sure what that is. but ASR has the same chip in the DP4 for > the most part. that's a real effects mainframe. one is a workstation and > one is a toy. you can make music with the korg but it's really really > limited. > > don't waste your money bro on an electribe. get the ASR-X. > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Matt <somatt@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Did u get it and how do u like it? I am thinking of asr-x from ebay or of > > electribe esx. I already have rs7000 sampler too but thinking of selling > > since it sits in the corner for difficulty of use and also I can't seem to > > program it on the fly. Or maybe I just need to spend more time with the > > manual. > > On Jan 12, 2011 2:06 PM, "SzÅ`nyi András" <andras@...> wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for a new non-E-MU question but I've just found an old machine for > > a > > > reasonable price. > > > Does anyone know the Ensoniq ASR-X Pro? - btw it looks like a prototype > > of > > > the E-MU Command Stations. :) > > > (http://www.vintagesynth.com/ensoniq/asrxpro.php) > > > > > > I'm especially curious about the sound of that, not the sequencer > > > capabilities. (The CS's sequencer or a DAW is good enough for me.) > > > > > > I know it is difficult to objectively talk about the sounds, > > > I try to give an example what kind of sound I'm looking for: > > > Until now I owned two samplers: E-MU ESI32 and an AKAI MPC 4000, > > > to be honest I felt the ESI has a much better sample playback. > > > (Unfortunately both machine had to be sold...) > > > > > > Do I think right the ASR-X Pro has an ESI32-like sound or better? > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > >
Message
Re: another sampler/sequnecer (almost OT)
2011-01-14 by Jarlath Hynes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.