I got the A5000 sampler today. It's the most absolute biggest pain to use. And whoever said it was thin... you were right, and I was flat wrong. It is thin. And this would a major pain to use everyday. It's huge and heavy and a real pain, and I can't see having fun with this pain in the butt. The SU700 was a little easier and actually taught me a couple things about sampling but Yamaha samplers aren't for me. They say Yamaha effects are just so darn good. I disagree. They use the same effect engine in everything, just as they did way back with CS1X which was the most plastic sounding thing ever. <br>
I majorly did not like this machine and the navigation is just weird and wrong. <br><br>Now I'm thinking about an Ultra. <br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Atom Smasher <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:atom@...">atom@...</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
<span> </span>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p></p><div class="im">On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Greg W wrote:<br>
<br></div><div class="im">
> A series are great but they dont beat the CS engines<br></div>
=============<br>
<br>
also, the AxK samplers allow tweaking of filter resonance while a note is <br>
playing. for some people that _is_ important.<div class="im"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
...atom<br>
<br>
________________________<br>
<a href="http://atom.smasher.org/" target="_blank">http://atom.smasher.org/</a><br>
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808<br>
-------------------------------------------------<br>
<br></div>
"The only inherent sin in society lies in hurting others<br>
unnecessarily. Hurting yourself in not sinful - just dumb."<br>
-- Robert Heinlein<br>
<br>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255); min-height: 0pt;"></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br>