In my view, the rule for the list should be no spam, personal insults or attacks. First time gets a warning, second time gets you booted from the list. steve_the_composer wrote: > > > > > Hey, Bob! Do you believe all the immature nonsense going on? I have > been very polite and understanding; I try to maintain a positive > outlook and try to do my best to help people solve problems/find work > arounds with their gear, look up relevant previous discussions from > the archives, etc. I have written privately to two of the verbal > "combattants" with what I thought was amazing calmness and > understanding. But it the nastiness seems to have spread to a third > person (maybe more). > > As I told you I am a believer of free speech and the thought of > moderating people's posts really bothers me. And you shouldn't have to > edit posts. I don't know what's gotten into people lately. We have > never had this BS here!!!! > > I also don't like the idea of booting people (except for spammers). If > someone wants to leave, that is their choice. > > Now that several people are on moderation, part of me wants to just > take them off moderation and tell them to "Grow up." (Like I told my > kids, I don't care who started it, both of you need to end it!) Yet, > as long as its done, part of me wants to just leave it where it is. In > any case, it is a waste of everyone's time. You shouldn't have to edit > or even approve/reject thses posts. > > My advice is just leave things the way they are--no more > editing/approval/rejecting and certainly no more kind, understanding > private e-mails to the "combattants." Let the posts just pile up no > matter if they are inciteful or benign!!!!!!! > > To echo what Greg said, thanks for trying to keep on top of it!! >
Message
Re: [xl7] (unknown)
2010-09-14 by Greg Waltzer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.