that sounds like a good idea. one thing i noticed with xmix that's a bit annoying is that there isn't a way to revert to the original part, but that shouldn't be a problem with this method. good stuff, let us know how you get on. massimo --- On Mon, 2/8/10, bobsvitilla <bobsvitilla@...> wrote: > From: bobsvitilla <bobsvitilla@...> > Subject: [xl7] Anyone work with a Command station like this? > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > Date: Monday, 2 August, 2010, 21:26 > I was considering a new work flow > method and was wondering if anyone tried something similar > and found strengths or difficulties with it. > I am trying to improve my ability in producing a > freeflow/improve workflow with my XL-7 than just bring > tracks in and out of a pattern flowing between > patterns. I mainly consentrate on live > performance. I was think of organizing patterns where > all the tracks are a paticular part. Couple of just > kick patterns, other paterns each with just: snares, tuned > percution, untuned percussion, basslines, pads, sound > effects, ect. Then use the Xmit function to build > sequences on the fly. > > Thanks for any input. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > xl7-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com > > >
Message
Re: [xl7] Anyone work with a Command station like this?
2010-08-02 by massimo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.