One place for more information on this category synth, search "rompler" on the internet...here is a site: <<http://www.emulatorarchive.com/Archives/ROMplers/romplers.html>> <<http://www.dnbwiki.com/index.php/Rompler>> Bob El Segundo, CA -----Original Message----- >From: Jane <rdxesy@...> >Sent: Jan 12, 2009 10:45 AM >To: xl7@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [xl7] my first post > > >On 12.01.2009, at 02:32, Aaron Eppolito wrote: > >> I believe all of the devices will take the selection for all >> channels/subs regardless of hardware, they'll just ignore the >> extras. Furthermore, all Proteus-class devices (P2k, P1k, XL-7, >> MK-6, etc) have the same 4 sets of subs, it's just that only some of >> them have hardware tied to them. Otherwise, they still have the same >> internal bussing architecture. >> >> -Aaron > >hey Aaron, it is nice to see an (ex?) e-mu engineer here. > >it would be nice to know wether a device actually has the outputs or >not so that my software can disable the controls for setting the >subout (to avoid confusion). i was wondering about why there is no >such information about this in any sysex data. my guess is that "e-mu" >knew that this information is "hidden" in some other parameter (namely >the number of MIDI-channels) but forgot to let us know. can you >confirm that every device that has 32 MIDI-channels also has multiple >stereo outputs and every device with 16 MIDI-channels has only one? > >also, can you recommend, or do you know a book about the technology e- >mu utilizes in their proteus 2000? i mean there are a lot of books >about synthesizers (moog style). but the proteus 2000 is not exactly a >synthesizer as its using sampled sound as its base, not oscillators. >what is this called; "sampling-technology", "sample synthesizer", or >just "sample-player"? > >maybe i should just look into sampler technology? > >thank you, >jN >
Message
Re: [xl7] my first post
2009-01-12 by Bob S.