wow, nice :) --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Mauricio Balma <balmaproducer@...> wrote: > > I can perfectly give a strong opinion about that, since I had a Virus B, and almost a year got the amazing Virus TI. > > Most of the freak hardware producers, don't have a good opinion about romplers. Romplers are inferior when talking about sound quality, capabilities of synthesis, and morphing sounds. They are just frozen recordings, "corpse sounds". I have owned around 10 romplers (mostly several workstations) and in this moment I have around 7 VAs, like the V synth, Virus T1, 3 Electribes and a Waldorf Q. > > Despite having a good arsenal of VAs, lots of my basses, leads, short blips, arpeggios, still comming from my two command stations engine. > > Combining several waves, with different settings on the Z plane filters, can result on phat, powerful sounds. > And that's amazing, considering the huge limitations of the command station's EFFECT section. > I have dig during years the cords section, using the quantizer parameter, pink, noise, connecting in all the possible ways these amazing pseudo modular section, and you can get incredible sounds there. > > Command station was made with a great concept. After using big synths like the waldorf or the T1, I still having fun creating sounds from scratch on the XL7 > > You guys made a great work with the command station, you realize that, when a producer that has multiple options for creating music, still having fun with the command station, sitting in the middle of an arsenal of real analog and virtual analog machines. > > I still recommending this "rompler" to each producer I meet. > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/25/08, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@...> wrote: > > From: Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@...> > Subject: Re: [xl7] virus vs xl7? > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > Date: Friday, July 25, 2008, 2:49 PM > > > > > > > You can go pretty far with the XL-7 as a pseudo-analog synth. What you'll miss: hard sync, ring mod, FM, really fast LFOs, self-resonant filters, live input. You can get PWM in the XL-7 by messing with the SLoop parameter, sorta do hard sync (albeit at a pretty slow rate) with SRetrig, and the realtime Q you can do with enough layers as I described a long time ago (one layer with low Q, one with high, RT control is via volume on the high-Q layer). > > People who dismiss the P2k engine as a "ROMpler" are missing out on some of the really cool stuff you can do in the patchcord section. (not dissing you in any way; on the contrary, I applaud you for thinking to use it in a more synth fashion!) > > The Virus is a cool synth and does have features that you simply won't get in the XL-7. That said, you can get pretty close (not necessarily worse, mind you, just different) for a majority of sounds and will certainly be able to make a ton of sounds a VA simply can't. > > It's a tough choice. I don't think you can go wrong with a Virus, but you might want to spend some time programming a patch or two in a VA style in the XL-7 before you decide to drop coin! > > -Aaron > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Atom Smasher <atom@smasher. org> > To: xl7@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:54:21 AM > Subject: [xl7] virus vs xl7? > > i have an empty space in my rack, and it's calling to me... one of the > things that i though about filling it with is a virus-rack. > > i haven't yet explored the synth engine of the xl7, and it'll be a few > weeks at least before i have a chance to dig around in it, so.... is > anyone here a current or former virus owner? how does the xl7 compare? > > right off the top, the virus is ostensibly a virtual analog synth, and the > xl7 seems more like a rompler. but i'm wondering if i could use some > "basic" waveforms, a few layers, some virtual patch-cords, and some midi > CC controllers and roll my own virtual analog patches...? i'm confident > that i can get good sounds out of it, but can it compete with a virus on > the the merits of the virus? > > i only have one ROM slot in my xl7 filled, and i think it's the XL ROM. > > -- > ...atom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: virus vs xl7?
2008-07-26 by malik
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.