On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Aaron Eppolito wrote:
> So, the hidden parameters aren't supposed to be set via sysex. The XL-7
> just happens to use a system where every parameter in the box is
> numbered, even if they're not publicly accessible or stored. The fact
> that you can set them via sysex is arguably a bug!
================
i'd call it an undocumented feature ;)
> You've already seen one example of having to do some strange
> convolutions to get a simple thing done - and that's one of the simpler
> ones!
==============
well, when you release an OS-3 for it, my first feature request is a MIDI
mode that will reserve a channel to listen for system messages, and
interpret LSB/PC messages as pattern changes ;)
> PS. Very good work on the message concatenation! I figured that with
> all parameter set messages you might be able to do it, but I wasn't sure
> if the code would work for arbitrary messages instead of dumps. I'm
> glad to see it works!
===============
as soon as i saw the hidden parameters that started with 0x01 i was
confident, based on my reading of the sysex, that it would work. i would
have been surprised if it didn't work in short form.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"With sheepish submissiveness the German people accepted that,
as a result of the [Reichstag] fire, each one of them lost
what little personal freedom and dignity was guaranteed by
the constitution; as though it followed as a necessary
consequence.... more than one [of my colleagues] hinted that
they had doubts about the official version; but none of them
saw anything out of the ordinary in the fact that, from now
on, one's telephone would be tapped, one's letters opened,
and one's desk might be broken into."
-- Sebastian Haffner, Defying Hitler: A MemoirMessage
Re: [xl7] Re: sysex pattern change?
2008-04-22 by Atom Smasher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.