I have two and use them as sequencers for live performances. I couldn't live without them. They do the "hard work" while playing on stage. Other synths that I have use as central brain for my hardware setup, collapse with too much MIDI information. Command stations are very brave synths, they tell to the other synths what to do, and I use them not just for sequencing, but also for the drum sequences and some leads. Great for organ chord hits due to their high reso filters.
Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@yahoo.com> wrote:
This is actually exactly the point of the XL-7. It's not meant to be a workstation. It's meant to be a live sequencing / inspiration capturing device. For full on MIDI editing, the computer is going to be easier to use. That's why the XL-7 incorporates a USB port and the Standard MIDI File as its native sequence format. If you want to do extensive editing, it's assumed that you'll do a quick roundtrip with your favorite sequencer of choice.
I'm not saying that there's not a class of people who want the all-in-one workstation (like yourself) but we had to devote feature development time somewhere, and in-depth editing came second to realtime live capture/performance.
Hope you enjoy it!
-Aaron
----- Original Message ----
From: Atom Smasher <atom@...>
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 7:56:58 PM
Subject: Re: [xl7] list edit increment
On
Wed,
23
Jan
2008,
Aaron
Eppolito
wrote:
>
-----
Original
Message
----
>
From:
Mauricio
Balma
<balmaproducer@...>
>
>>
I
like
to
add
randomized
values
to
my
notes
to
give
a
human
touch
to
>>
the
track.
I
donÿÿt
like
too
accurate
start
times,
so,
if
recorded
>>
quantized,
I
go
note
by
note
to
modify
the
start
time
of
each
one.
>>
Thatÿÿs
very
hard
on
the
command
station.
>
>
Wow,
that's
dedication.
Note/List
Edit
were
put
in
there
as
a
last
>
resort
if
you
really
had
to
edit
that
sort
of
detail.
It's
not
>
something
I
try
to
use
too
often.
When
I
do,
it's
usually
to
erase
(or
>
transpose)
that
one
bum
note
in
a
track.
You
can
use
it
to
do
full
>
editing,
but
it's
really
just
to
hard
to
do
computer
style
sequencing
on
>
a
2x24
character
display!
================
the
MC-50
(and
MC-50mk2)
only
have
2
line
displays,
but
they
have
just
about
every
edit
feature
you'd
want
implemented
reasonably
well.
and
for
everything
else,
there's
the
"microscope
mode";
similar
to
the
note
edit
on
the
XL7
but
each
note/event
plays
as
you
scroll
to
it,
and
of
course
it
doesn't
work
while
playing/recording.
for
loops
and
realtime
stuff
i'll
take
the
XL7...
for
off-line
editing
the
MC-50
wins.
i
really
wish
the
XL7
had
the
editing
capabilities
of
the
MC-50...
the
MC-50
makes
it
easy
to
extract
data
from
one
track
to
another
(or
delete)
based
on
channel,
note
(range),
bar
(range),
etc...
these
things
can
be
done
on
the
XL7
but
it
seems
like
i'd
have
to
make
extensive
use
of
the
clipboard
and
bounce
things
around
and
still
edit
midi
events
one
at
a
time.
--
...atom
__________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [xl7] list edit increment
2008-02-18 by Mauricio Balma
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.