Thanks for all replies! It's an interesting and useful discussion. (for convenience, I'm responding to several posts at once) Atom Smasher <atom@...> wrote: > on the rm1x, is there anything special about 60 "styles" * 16 > "variations", or is that really just a fancy way of saying "960 > patterns"? is there any special relation between the styles and > variations? "Variations" are just assignments of MIDI "phrases" to the 16 tracks. The instruments, effects and track->channel routings do not change. If you know Ableton Live, think of a "style" as a Live project, and "variations" as scenes. What's interesting is that phrases can be named, and phrase memory is global (shared among all styles). This means that you can change a phrase that a track plays, to any other phrase from Rm1x memory, in realtime - somewhat like Xmix, except that the change happens when phrase loops over, rather than instantly. > can the rm1x have multiple midi channels per track? looking at the > manual, it doesn't seem possible. No, it's not possible. Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@...> wrote: > Also, as I've said, try Xmix. Since you can save and switch > patterns while playing (make sure you save your edits before > editing the next!), you can easily set up a duplicate sequence > then use Xmix to pull in interesting tracks in realtime. > Give it a shot, you might like the flexibility! > > Also, another interesting thing is to save your sequence to a new > location while playing. This automatically puts you in the new > sequence without stopping or resyncing to the beginning or anything. > You can make a variation then switch between in realtime. > Also, you could then record those changes in song mode too... Thanks for the suggestions Aaron! I really should try this, and look deeper into Xmix. Mauricio Balma <balmaproducer@...> wrote: > I have two command stations, they work on my setup like the two > sides off the brain. One of them controls objective, tangible, > very logic and reasonable sound concepts, and the other one, works > more with the abstract and subjective concepts of the music, the > combination of both results on a balance between order and chaotic music. Now that is really intriguing! So, you run both sequencers in parallel? I actually have XL7 and MP7, and thought of selling one of them. But now I'm having second thoughts.. :))
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: XL7, compared to...
2008-01-24 by gutman75
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.