For me, one thing:
I have to seldom stop the seq while I'm working.
Only required on a few tasks. Big plus, as I'm doing
music mostly live, while recording to audio, then lately
cutting and assembling the parts.
I know this was not mentioned but I'm looking forward
to the LinnDrum II from Dave Smith/Roger Linn.
Combined with my XL-7 it would be a dream setup
both for sequencing and songwriting. The LinnDrum II
would work along the same concept - you don't have to
stop the sequencer to accomplish the most editing tasks,
at least that's how it is advertised. I'm collecting money...
Regards,
Zsolt | http://adsr.hu
----- Original Message -----
From: Atom Smasher
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:05 AM
Subject: [xl7] XL7, compared to...
this should be an interesting forum to ask this question...
i've never had any hands on with these:
XL-7, RM1x, MPC-xxx, MC-303/505/etc
of the RM1x and assorted roland garbage, i don't have to hear the XL-7 to
know that the sounds are better, and i doubt that anyone here would debate
me on that.
but regarding a sequencer, who can tell me what makes the XL7 better than
the rest for live performance? i'm not looking to start a flame war, and
i'm definitely leaning towards the XL7, but if anyone has used the other
gear, i'm interested in hearing about how they compare.
thanks...
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"The universe is not hostile, nor yet is it friendly.
It is simply indifferent."
-- John Hughes Holmes
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [xl7] XL7, compared to...
2008-01-14 by Zsolt Szabó
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.