Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

"holds back tears"

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "steve_the_composer" <smw-mail@...> wrote:
>
> The artist formerly known as rEalm referenced an unreleased Command 
> Station OS that had the realtime filter controls (resonance).
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/message/15123
> 
> > Why do you want an older OS? There's no reason at all to downgrade
> > to an older OS for the XX-7's. Well, except that beta version with
> > realtime Q enabled, but you won't find that :)
> 
> The smiley face made me think perhaps he had a copy of the beta 
> version. 
> 
> See also:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/message/15133
> 
> Anyone here have a copy of that beta version? 
> 
>   
> 
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, malik martin <malik_martin@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > did someone say homebrew mod?
> > XD
> > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> > From: synthesis77@
> > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:14:49 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: Filter question
> > 
> >     
> >             Whoa, that did get released?  Wow.  For the E4's 
tamer 
> filters, it wasn't really a problem.  On the P2k/XL-7 side, the 
12th 
> order filters were a little, um, excitable.  =)  I do seem to 
> remember there being two cord destinations, one for RT Q and the 
old 
> one for note on Q.  Hmm, maybe we proto'd that in the XL-7 too?  
> It's been a while...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -Aaron
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > 
> > From: gutman75 <bgutman@>
> > 
> > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> > 
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:37:05 AM
> > 
> > Subject: [xl7] Re: Filter question
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Oops, I mean 4.71 . I installed it on E6400 Ultra, and haven't 
> > 
> > noticed any glitches - should I have?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "gutman75" <bgutman@> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > > Sorry if this is OT, but what about the Ultra line of E-mu 
> > 
> > samplers? 
> > 
> > > The latest EOS (3.71 IIRC) adds realtime Q, does it also 
> > 
> > > cause "glitches and filter instability"?
> > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@> wrote:
> > 
> > > >
> > 
> > > > Yep, Q is note on.  I posted a long time ago about "faking" Q 
> > 
> > with 
> > 
> > > a duplicate layer.  Simply duplicate the layer you like, turn Q 
> all 
> > 
> > > the way up on one and down on the other.  Then, route a 
> controller 
> > 
> > to 
> > 
> > > volume on the one with high Q, essentially fading in the Q 
layer 
> > 
> > with 
> > 
> > > the knob.  Sounds really good. 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > We had a test build that tried to do realtime Q on the E4, 
but 
> it 
> > 
> > > was pretty glitchy sounding.  In a nutshell, the filter chips 
> only 
> > 
> > > have one interpolator, meaning you either get realtime Fc or 
> > 
> > realtime 
> > 
> > > Q.  To do both, you have to continuously pound the chip with 
new 
> > 
> > > filter coefficients and use the interpolator to slam between 
the 
> > 
> > > two.  It doesn't work so well in practice - there were a lot of 
> > 
> > > glitches and filter instability.
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > And, to answer your original question, yes, you can have 4 
> > 
> > > different layers with 4 different filter knobs.  SImply unhook 
> the 
> > 
> > > default knob assignment for the knob you want to use, then hook 
> one 
> > 
> > > per layer to the parameter you want to control.
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > -Aaron
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > ----- Original Message ----
> > 
> > > > From: malik <malik_martin@>
> > 
> > > > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> > 
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 9:10:33 PM
> > 
> > > > Subject: [xl7] Re: Filter question
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > looks iike i accidentally added myself to a thread from 2001, 
> that
> > 
> > > > answers my second question. too bad that never got fixed(or 
> > 
> > > upgraded).
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "malik" <malik_martin@> wrote:
> > 
> > > > >
> > 
> > > > > i just noticed something about my quick edit Res knob. It's 
> not
> > 
> > > > > changing Q in realtime!!! I haven't noticed this before! If 
> i'm
> > 
> > > > > holding a note. and i mess with it. nothing happens until i 
> > 
> > > release
> > 
> > > >  it
> > 
> > > > > and press again. then i can hear the result.
> > 
> > > > > 
> > 
> > > > > is this a setting?
> > 
> > > > > 
> > 
> > > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "malik" <malik_martin@> wrote:
> > 
> > > > > >
> > 
> > > > > > Hi,
> > 
> > > > > > Recently read something arron was posting about synthesis 
> and
> > 
> > > >  decided 
> > 
> > > > > > to put my programming fingers down for a day or two and 
get
> > 
> > > > reaquainted.
> > 
> > > > > > so anyway, i'm individualy messing with wavforms on 
> different
> > 
> > > >  layers 
> > 
> > > > > > and was wondering. if i have 4 different waveforms with 4 
> > 
> > > different
> > 
> > > >  
> > 
> > > > > > filters, could i use the quick edit knobs to define 
cutoff 
> > 
> > for 
> > 
> > > all
> > 
> > > >  4 
> > 
> > > > > > diff filters?
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > 
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > 
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection 
> around 
> > 
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > 
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > 
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >       
> > 
> >     
> >     
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>