did someone say homebrew mod?
XD
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
From: synthesis77@...
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:14:49 -0700
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: Filter question
Whoa, that did get released? Wow. For the E4's tamer filters, it wasn't really a problem. On the P2k/XL-7 side, the 12th order filters were a little, um, excitable. =) I do seem to remember there being two cord destinations, one for RT Q and the old one for note on Q. Hmm, maybe we proto'd that in the XL-7 too? It's been a while...
-Aaron
----- Original Message ----
From: gutman75 <bgutman@...>
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:37:05 AM
Subject: [xl7] Re: Filter question
Oops, I mean 4.71 . I installed it on E6400 Ultra, and haven't
noticed any glitches - should I have?
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "gutman75" <bgutman@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is OT, but what about the Ultra line of E-mu
samplers?
> The latest EOS (3.71 IIRC) adds realtime Q, does it also
> cause "glitches and filter instability"?
>
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@> wrote:
> >
> > Yep, Q is note on. I posted a long time ago about "faking" Q
with
> a duplicate layer. Simply duplicate the layer you like, turn Q all
> the way up on one and down on the other. Then, route a controller
to
> volume on the one with high Q, essentially fading in the Q layer
with
> the knob. Sounds really good.
> >
> >
> > We had a test build that tried to do realtime Q on the E4, but it
> was pretty glitchy sounding. In a nutshell, the filter chips only
> have one interpolator, meaning you either get realtime Fc or
realtime
> Q. To do both, you have to continuously pound the chip with new
> filter coefficients and use the interpolator to slam between the
> two. It doesn't work so well in practice - there were a lot of
> glitches and filter instability.
> >
> >
> > And, to answer your original question, yes, you can have 4
> different layers with 4 different filter knobs. SImply unhook the
> default knob assignment for the knob you want to use, then hook one
> per layer to the parameter you want to control.
> >
> >
> > -Aaron
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: malik <malik_martin@>
> > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 9:10:33 PM
> > Subject: [xl7] Re: Filter question
> >
> >
> > looks iike i accidentally added myself to a thread from 2001, that
> > answers my second question. too bad that never got fixed(or
> upgraded).
> >
> > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "malik" <malik_martin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > i just noticed something about my quick edit Res knob. It's not
> > > changing Q in realtime!!! I haven't noticed this before! If i'm
> > > holding a note. and i mess with it. nothing happens until i
> release
> > it
> > > and press again. then i can hear the result.
> > >
> > > is this a setting?
> > >
> > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "malik" <malik_martin@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Recently read something arron was posting about synthesis and
> > decided
> > > > to put my programming fingers down for a day or two and get
> > reaquainted.
> > > > so anyway, i'm individualy messing with wavforms on different
> > layers
> > > > and was wondering. if i have 4 different waveforms with 4
> different
> >
> > > > filters, could i use the quick edit knobs to define cutoff
for
> all
> > 4
> > > > diff filters?
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
RE: [xl7] Re: Filter question
2007-11-01 by malik martin