Whoa, that did get released? Wow. For the E4's tamer filters, it wasn't really a problem. On the P2k/XL-7 side, the 12th order filters were a little, um, excitable. =) I do seem to remember there being two cord destinations, one for RT Q and the old one for note on Q. Hmm, maybe we proto'd that in the XL-7 too? It's been a while... -Aaron ----- Original Message ---- From: gutman75 <bgutman@...> To: xl7@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:37:05 AM Subject: [xl7] Re: Filter question Oops, I mean 4.71 . I installed it on E6400 Ultra, and haven't noticed any glitches - should I have? --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "gutman75" <bgutman@...> wrote: > > Sorry if this is OT, but what about the Ultra line of E-mu samplers? > The latest EOS (3.71 IIRC) adds realtime Q, does it also > cause "glitches and filter instability"? > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@> wrote: > > > > Yep, Q is note on. I posted a long time ago about "faking" Q with > a duplicate layer. Simply duplicate the layer you like, turn Q all > the way up on one and down on the other. Then, route a controller to > volume on the one with high Q, essentially fading in the Q layer with > the knob. Sounds really good. > > > > > > We had a test build that tried to do realtime Q on the E4, but it > was pretty glitchy sounding. In a nutshell, the filter chips only > have one interpolator, meaning you either get realtime Fc or realtime > Q. To do both, you have to continuously pound the chip with new > filter coefficients and use the interpolator to slam between the > two. It doesn't work so well in practice - there were a lot of > glitches and filter instability. > > > > > > And, to answer your original question, yes, you can have 4 > different layers with 4 different filter knobs. SImply unhook the > default knob assignment for the knob you want to use, then hook one > per layer to the parameter you want to control. > > > > > > -Aaron > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: malik <malik_martin@> > > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 9:10:33 PM > > Subject: [xl7] Re: Filter question > > > > > > looks iike i accidentally added myself to a thread from 2001, that > > answers my second question. too bad that never got fixed(or > upgraded). > > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "malik" <malik_martin@> wrote: > > > > > > i just noticed something about my quick edit Res knob. It's not > > > changing Q in realtime!!! I haven't noticed this before! If i'm > > > holding a note. and i mess with it. nothing happens until i > release > > it > > > and press again. then i can hear the result. > > > > > > is this a setting? > > > > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "malik" <malik_martin@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Recently read something arron was posting about synthesis and > > decided > > > > to put my programming fingers down for a day or two and get > > reaquainted. > > > > so anyway, i'm individualy messing with wavforms on different > > layers > > > > and was wondering. if i have 4 different waveforms with 4 > different > > > > > > filters, could i use the quick edit knobs to define cutoff for > all > > 4 > > > > diff filters? > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Yahoo! Groups Links __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: Filter question
2007-10-31 by Aaron Eppolito
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.