I didn't talk here about automatical PPQN decrease.
I was talking about lower PPQN value on the MPC compared to the
CS. Sorry if I was misunderstood, english is not my native language.
Regards,
Zsolt
----- Original Message -----
From: "milesegan" <milesegan@...>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:28 PM
Subject: [xl7] Re: good partners for the px-7?
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Zsolt Szab\ufffd <Zsolt.Szabo@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Aaron and gonzinigonz,
>
> yes, I understand that lower PPQN is similar to quantize.
> However, this would mean also that busy loops with many
> tracks would exhibit larger quantize resolution as the PPQN decreases.
Why would the PPQN automatically decrease? On the MPC it's a constant
96. I think the reason people think the MPC sounds so tight is that
the output is run through an onboard compressor by default which makes
everything sound punchy.
Yahoo! Groups LinksMessage
Re: [xl7] Re: good partners for the px-7?
2006-10-04 by Zsolt Szabó
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.