Oh, however, of course I know most of the physical problems is not in all XL-7's (but I was suprised I had so many of them), but I've heard that other people have also sold the XL-7, because it "freezes" sometimes for them as well. It's not fun when you play live and it does this. //Nifflas --- In xl7@y..., "nifflas" <nifflas@m...> wrote: > Since my XL-7 crashed all the time I havn't had time to look at the > new OS. The machine just "freezes" at random moments, about a few > times per day. By this reason I was forced to send the XL-7 back, and > the guys have had it for 3 months now (should have been repaired > now), and I've lost many chances to play live with it because of > that. The data wheel was not working correctly, some knobs was also > acting strange. Not to mention some of the keypads. > > And about the bugs: There was a whole lot of them in OS 1.01, and > I've heard that some are still left (as I said I havn't had a chance > to look at the new OS), and since I payed extra money when it still > was new (Didn't have the chance to get the expansion boards cheaper > either since I live in Sweden), I just felt like a beta tester for > some unfinished gear. And I had to pay extra money for a synth with > bugs and a whole lot of physical problems (like the odd data knob). > > That's why I regret that I bought it. > > ...So personally I think I have reasons to be quite dissapointed. > > At the other hand, of course I understand that this is just my > opinions. > > >you'd know that if you set a track to external, it won't > automatically insert these events into the track. You can set any > information you want up in the track list editor. > > Okey, you might be right about that. Havn't had a chance to try it > since they're still repairing the XL-7. Can't understand why they > just didn't send me a new XL-7. > > //Nifflas > > > > > > > --- In xl7@y..., Aaron Eppolito <aarone+xl7@e...> wrote: > > "Thorsten Marx" <t.marx@h...> wrote: > > > > > I'm thinking about buying an XL7 because I like the idea of > > > creating and arranging music without a computer .My question is, > how > > > good is the sequencer for playing an external MIDI device, in my > case > > > I would trigger an Ensoniq ASR-X sampler. Is the timing OK? Are > the > > > functions handy? > > > > nifflas replied: > > > > > No, for controlling your extrenal gear, this is not what you're > > > looking for. > > > > In your opinion. Prove me wrong, but I think you'll find few other > > all-in-one boxes that perform as well. You have full control over > what gets > > sent to external gear if you set the tracks to external. You have > 32 > > external midi channels plus 32 internal channels with 128 voices of > > polyphony. You have 16 programmable knobs just waiting to control > every > > aspect of your external synths. You have full record on the fly > capabilities > > with almost nothing that makes you stop the sequencer. You have > complete > > interactivity with the arrangement of patterns without having to > fit them > > into a "style" or flatten them down into a song. I could go on and > on, but > > I'll let you read the reviews (Jan 2002 issue of Keyboard gave it a > Key Buy). > > > > > > > > > * The OS has many bugs and the machine sometimes crashes > > > > I'll be the first to admit that there are a few bugs. I'm not sure > I'd > > classify them as "many", but I won't argue there. E-mu has a > strong history > > of supporting its users. We continuously add features and > bugfixes, add > > provide them free for the downloading. We not too long ago > released updates > > for the original E-IV classics, a product that shipped in 1994. We > still are > > adding features to XL-7 and are trying to fix as many problems as > we can > > find. There's a release scheduled for late February that addresses > many of > > the issues that you folks have brought up. > > > > > > > * Stupid re-channelize. If you wish to use a MIDI keyboard to > control > > > the XL-7 and also the external synths, the midi thru doesn't > behave > > > as you would expect from a sequencer. Check the other posts for > more > > > info about this. Also it seems like the EMU guys have no plans to > fix > > > this, at least not now. (Perhaps they havn't realized how > important > > > this is) > > > > We're not idiots, you know. We're aware that more and more people > are using > > the XL-7 as a controller for external gear. We've been steadily > adding > > features to make the more advanced users happy. We know that this > is what > > you want and we'll probably give it to you. > > > > > > > * I have multisetups on my synths that gets messed up if the XL- 7 > > > sends volume, pan or program change messages. Yet it does this > > > automaticly if an "out" track is enabled, so I had to buy a MIDI > > > filter to filter out such messages. > > > > If you had read the manual addendum, or any of my posts about the > subject, > > you'd know that if you set a track to external, it won't > automatically insert > > these events into the track. You can set any information you want > up in the > > track list editor. > > > > -Aaron > > > > > > > I'm very dissapointed with the sequencer part of the XL-7. I > > > recommend you to check out the Kawai Q80EXE instead. And there's > also > > > many other great hardware sequencers. > > > > > > //Nifflas
Message
Re: XL7 Sequencer for playing external MIDI
2002-01-29 by nifflas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.