--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Sharma" <noision1@h...> wrote:
> Your first major error is to equate sampling and/or distributing a
> self-made synthesizer patch (i.e. what sample sets of moogs and
> other synths are or should be) with distributing (for money or
> free) samples (copies) of someone else's samples or patchs or
> collections of samples/patches. The former anyone is free to do.
[snip]
I like a good argument as well as the next guy, so let me chime in
here.
I wrote two responses earlier in the week but did not send them
because I thought they might inadvertantly contribute to animosity.
For the record, good arguments (1) use sound logic, and (2) do not
use ad hominems, invectives, hyperbole, etc.
I hope the discussion continues. It is worthy of discussion.
Steve_the_pacifist
|8-[>Message
The Current Legal Discussion: Drawing Fine Lines: Samples & Presets
2004-02-23 by steve_the_composer