That's why I do not need the audio input... I think it's far more accurate if you can just tap the tempo, and then do fine adjustments with the "nudge" function to accurately que up the music. -> If I can lay my hands on a micro sync I would not use the audio input. --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Stu" <routerman@z...> wrote: > What OS version is your MicroSync? Mine is 2.04, and I gotta say I found the > midiclock output when there's no input audio signal to be a bit erratic. > > I also agree with you saying it needs a lag processor when it's syncing to > audio - sometimes it starts pushing and pulling the beats all over the place > even when there's a steady beat. > > Stu > > -----Original Message----- > From: erik_magrini@B... [mailto:erik_magrini@B...] > Sent: 11 February 2004 16:12 > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: BPM syncronisation device > > > That's why they can afford to sell them so cheap. :) > > rEalm > > > > > I hope they made a decent clone of the sync device and put it for > once in a metal casing in place of a plastic one... I really hate > that poor building quality on some Behringer things. > > > > > > > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally > privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than > the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege > or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other > use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the > material from any computer. > > For Translation: > > http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: BPM syncronisation device
2004-02-12 by steven_volckaert
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.