Yes that is a dumb question, haha. :) Let's put it this way. I used to
be huge fan of the mc505 (long before the XX-7's were a twinkle in Emu's
eye), and I still think it's a really nice machine. I had the chance to
ditch the XL-7 and go with a Mc909 when they came out, but I didn't for
the following reasons:
- Limited polyphony. Yeah, 64 voices isn't bad, but I knew I'd eat them
up in a heartbeat once I started layering my presets. Plus, the XV ROMs
can use stereo waveforms, which eat up two voices each. So a single note
with 4 layers would eat up 8 voices, ouch!
- No megamix. This is Roland's equivelant of XMIX (to be fair, XMIX is
actually Emu's interpretation on Megamix) and it's a godsend as far as I'm
concerned for live use. You could play hours of songs live without having
to stop the set to select a new track or Pattern. Opens up all kinds of
creative possibilities.
- Size. The mc909 is a real beast, very large and not as easily portable
as the XX-7's. There's nothing like heading down to the park to make some
music outside to spur on some inspiration.
I had to confront this choice again very recently when I won the PX-7. I
was given the option of putting that credit towards a mc909 or
MPC2000/4000 if I wanted. I'll admit, I did think about it for quite a
bit too. Why? Onboard sampling. It's a big deal for people like me who
have a lot of custom samples they want to use, or who might want to take
their studio creations live. It would save me the (ongoing) trouble of
trying to find a sampler to complement my XL-7.
Eventually though, I knew that if I got a mc909 and left the group, no one
here would be able to pick a ROM for themselves, or know how to use effect
sends, so I decided I better stay for your sake.
J/K!
Actually I've gotten to really enjoy using the XX-7, it's fast and dead
easy to program, sounds great, and is far better for me live. Plus, it
just feels like an "instrument" when I play it. I don't feel like I'm
programming a computer, or sequencing at all. The lines between Pattern
and Preset creations totally blur for me, and I'm just making cool sounds
I can play back for others. Something that not much other gear nowadays
makes me feel like....
rEalm
bluetechnics <ksellers88@...>
02/10/2004 01:29 PM
Please respond to xl7
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
cc:
Subject: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909
Thanks for the input fellas. Given the pros and cons of each unit,
which would you ultimately choose (is this a dumb question considering
this is an XX-7 group?)
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> Whew, that's quite task! (Obviously we prefer the XX-7's too)
Here's some
> things in short:
>
> MC909 has 64 voices of polyphony, XX-7 has 128.
> MC909 has a master effect compressor, and IMO better effects overall.
> XX-7 has XMIX, 909 lost the Megamix that the 505 had.
> MC909 has only one expansion slot for additional sounds (I think
it's 1),
> the XX-7 has 3.
>
> If Ravi reads this, he can probably add more, as I think he still has
> both...
> rEalm
>
>
>
>
>
> Other than the fact that the XL7 can't sample, has anyone compared the
> pros and cons of the XL7 vs MC909? Has anyone worked with these units
> and which do you prefer?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally
> privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than
> the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege
> or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
> use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from any computer.
>
> For Translation:
>
> http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally
privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than
the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege
or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.
For Translation:
http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.