Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:33 UTC

Message

Re: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Yes that is a dumb question, haha.  :)  Let's put it this way.  I used to 
be huge fan of the mc505 (long before the XX-7's were a twinkle in Emu's 
eye), and I still think it's a really nice machine.  I had the chance to 
ditch the XL-7 and go with a Mc909 when they came out, but I didn't for 
the following reasons:

- Limited polyphony.  Yeah, 64 voices isn't bad, but I knew I'd eat them 
up in a heartbeat once I started layering my presets.  Plus, the XV ROMs 
can use stereo waveforms, which eat up two voices each.  So a single note 
with 4 layers would eat up 8 voices, ouch!
- No megamix.  This is Roland's equivelant of XMIX (to be fair, XMIX is 
actually Emu's interpretation on Megamix) and it's a godsend as far as I'm 
concerned for live use.  You could play hours of songs live without having 
to stop the set to select a new track or Pattern.  Opens up all kinds of 
creative possibilities.
- Size.  The mc909 is a real beast, very large and not as easily portable 
as the XX-7's.  There's nothing like heading down to the park to make some 
music outside to spur on some inspiration.

I had to confront this choice again very recently when I won the PX-7.  I 
was given the option of putting that credit towards a mc909 or 
MPC2000/4000 if I wanted.  I'll admit, I did think about it for quite a 
bit too.  Why?  Onboard sampling.  It's a big deal for people like me who 
have a lot of custom samples they want to use, or who might want to take 
their studio creations live.  It would save me the (ongoing) trouble of 
trying to find a sampler to complement my XL-7.

Eventually though, I knew that if I got a mc909 and left the group, no one 
here would be able to pick a ROM for themselves, or know how to use effect 
sends, so I decided I better stay for your sake.

J/K!

Actually I've gotten to really enjoy using the XX-7, it's fast and dead 
easy to program, sounds great, and is far better for me live.  Plus, it 
just feels like an "instrument" when I play it.  I don't feel like I'm 
programming a computer, or sequencing at all.  The lines between Pattern 
and Preset creations totally blur for me, and I'm just making cool sounds 
I can play back for others.  Something that not much other gear nowadays 
makes me feel like....

rEalm






bluetechnics <ksellers88@...>
02/10/2004 01:29 PM
Please respond to xl7

 
        To:     xl7@yahoogroups.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909


Thanks for the input fellas. Given the pros and cons of each unit,
which would you ultimately choose (is this a dumb question considering
this is an  XX-7 group?) 
 

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> Whew, that's quite task! (Obviously we prefer the XX-7's too) 
Here's some 
> things in short:
> 
> MC909 has 64 voices of polyphony, XX-7 has 128.
> MC909 has a master effect compressor, and IMO better effects overall.
> XX-7 has XMIX, 909 lost the Megamix that the 505 had.
> MC909 has only one expansion slot for additional sounds (I think
it's 1), 
> the XX-7 has 3.
> 
> If Ravi reads this, he can probably add more, as I think he still has 
> both...
> rEalm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Other than the fact that the XL7 can't sample, has anyone compared the
> pros and cons of the XL7 vs MC909? Has anyone worked with these units
> and which do you prefer? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity 
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally 
> privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than 
> the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege 
> or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
> use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you 
> receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
> material from any computer.
> 
> For Translation:
> 
> http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity 
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally 
privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than 
the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege 
or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you 
receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
material from any computer.

For Translation:

http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.