Can we get an AMEN!!!!
u_ri_p_ui <u_ri_p_ui@...> wrote:Hi,
I'm from Germany, and I managed to get probably the last E-MU XL-7
box sold in a store in this country. ;-)) I've tried five different
music stores and only the last shop had one left. Can't believe it.
1) No more XL-7 any more? :-(( Such a great box for no one else
anymore, never? Why?
Ok, now to my main question:
2) what's the difference between the XL-7 and a virtual-analogue
synthesizer like, let's say, the Virus C?
Let's compare:
You have four oscillators (layers) per preset. -> like a Virus C
You can choose four basic analogue waveforms: sine, saw, pulse and
triangle (and more) -> like a Virus C
You can attach two envelopes per oscillator -> the Virus C has got
ADSTR-Envelopes
You can attach two LFOs per oscillator -> the Virus C has got 3 LFOs
You can attach a filter out of many per oscillator -> the Virus has
got 2 filters per oscillator
The only thing I miss ist FM.
3) Does someone of you know how I can simulate FM on the XL-7?
I've got my unit today, listened to the preset patterns and songs,
which are not bad, but also not good. The sound enginge of that beast
can do so much more. Unforunately, the patterns are somewhat ugly,
too.
Never mind, I've played around with the preset voices and their pre-
set audition patterns. Let's take preset 0501 (syn: SweetDream),
choose this and listen to its pattern (audition). Nice, isn't it?
So, then I've stepped into the "preset editor" and saw that there are
only two oscillators used. So I chose 'wav: saw' for the 3. oscilla-
tor. Fine detuned O1 -5 cent, O2 0 cent, and O3 +5 cent. Then I've
found a filter (don't know its name anymore, sorry) that makes the
saw oscillator sound like a bell. Then I chose for oscillator 2 a-
nother waveform (wav: sin) instead of the preset one. Played a little
around with the filter and chorus settings, and voil�: a very nice
and beefy bell-like sound made only of analogue waveforms. Chose
a panning delay with chorus as FXB, and... Listen yourself. ;-))
Editing sounds is so easy on that beast. I can't understand why
someone doesn't like sound editing that way.
Now, if I look at what I've done: what, the heck, is the difference
between my XL-7 and the Virus C of my grandpa? ;-))
I've played around with the VST-Synths of FruityLoops but they sound
so tiny and need so much effects to sound a little bit well that's
no compare to the XL-7.
Guys, what do we have here? I mean, there's a pad preset: "pad: Ark
Deko". I only press one key of the pads, and it sounds like if I'm
pressing a whole chord.
All this with 128-voice polyphony...
Sorry for my bad English, many thanks in advance, cheers and peace,
Uri
Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
(((4TFY)))
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [xl7] Difference between an XL7 and a vitual-analogue synthesizer?
2004-01-16 by DJ 4TFY
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.