Matt is correct. Splitting the signal from a single Midi output by adding a second pair of cables seems suspicious to me. First, your cutting the signal strength in half which could add problems all it's own. Second, your allowing no more information down the sum of these now "TWO" Midi cables then you originaly had. And,unless your feeding to two seperate destinations and avoiding a through at some point, there is no advantage that I can think of. psychogroove1 --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Picone" <matman@m...> wrote: > > The sequences can spit out whatever you put into > > it, it just might not fit down the cable as fast as you'd > > like. So splitting the cable into two should open up some room. > > I certainly DON'T want to interpool the signals sent between midi > devices with a simple solder job. It's not smart at all. > > Secondly, the logic here is all wrong. You're just cramming the same > data into 1 1/2 cables. All you're avoiding is the delay caused by midi > thru. > > A midi splitter is a much smarter choice here. $35 or less on ebay. > > > -m@
Message
Re: Keeping midi tight
2003-12-28 by psychogroove1
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.