To me it feels just fine, way tighter then rm1x that I use to have.All the sequencers have timing issues when a lot of stuff is going on, thats why there is swing.I only use esi2000 as sound module and its not a problem when you nudge the notes with swing and that feature is mainly used for opening up the space.Theoreticaly, two midi outs are as double as better then one becouse one out can only send one note at the time.Sometimes people blame sloppiness on timing of the sequencer, but its 98% of time doe to the composition.Also if you use a lot of control change and pich shift in the recording, that will effect it in a way becouse those kinds od messages contain more data then note on and off. mike <curiousproductions@...> wrote: I think that in the xl the midi priority starts from track one and moves down the line. At least that is what i rember reading. Am i to take it the Midi B outs are way down the line then? or as least come in sequence after the A outs? Trying to keep midi timing as tight as possable is all. Please give a shout if ya know the answer to this one. And just a general question, how do you all find the timing on this box? I feel that at times it gets kinda sloppy when i have arps going and what not. Mike G. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [xl7] Keeping midi tight
2003-12-21 by khjkkkkk khjkhjk