Isn't that where the most fun is, using things for other than what they were
intended? I'm still trying to grok the JAG process, I think Grant called it a
mapper, so why not a signal/waveform mapper now that we know the
frequency response?
My math is far behind me, but this thing reminds me of forgotten transfer
functions and Cartesian to polar/vector cooridinate conversion and like the
man says it is an analog computer, somewhat like Paul's MOTM 510
WaveWarper (which I want as well), but the JAG is doing multiple static linear
transfer functions as opposed to the 510's single, yet dynamic, exponential
transform. Math people: feel free to set me straight, the point is that they are
both analog computers.
The serious analog computer signal artist probably needs at least one of each
and Comdyna or two. :-)
http://www.comdyna.com/music.htm
Barry
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "mrboningen" <
darkflametwentythree@h...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> i hadn't even begun to THINK of the possibilties of processing audio
> (as opposed to just using it as a joystick/lfo cv only module) with
> the JAG, wow, can't wait till mine arrives!
>
> gregg