Wiardgroup

Just my 2cents, and I'll try to keep this short.

There are two things about the Wiard that immediately springs out at me -
and this was my initial gut reaction
when seeing the beast on the web.

Obviously, I was very concerned about the sound it would create (that's
point #2) but I was immediately struck
by the care that had gone into the instruments design - such as the pots
which don't get to cold, and certainly
the paint job.

IMO, it is very important not to forget that the price of this system is
naturally much higher than most synths
on the market. Certainly, it is not in any way excessive when compared to
other analog modular competition, but we
all know how easy it can be to be swayed towards a "digital modular" at
(less?) than half price, with "other digital advantages".

On a PERSONAL basis, I was sold on the Wiard after I heard some of the
sounds.
BUT, what sold me on even pursuing things up to that point was the _whole
look_ of this system.

I thought to myself "gee, with that much care put into it, Wiard is a
musical system that I could
really cherish. I would be amazingly proud to have a system like this in my
studio - I mean, it's
a work of art! Where's the comparison?"

For me, if I'm going to spend the kind of money that the Wiard demands, it
really needs to be
that special for me. Further more, I really love the "Wiard" as "a work of
art" concept - because
to me it seems to fit well with both the "art" and the way that the system
has been mapped out
to work.

This individuality of the system definitely sets it a cut above others, and
greatly increases
the value in my mind. Even a "regular Wiard" looks like a custom job. That's
something to be proud of!

Robert

----- Original Message -----
From: "C. Whitten" <chris@cwhitten.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: [wiardgroup] faceplates


> > In my opinion you are wasting space on this forum.
> OK so I HAVE to break my promise!
> Firstly, I really enjoyed the last flurry of emails from both sides of the
> argument. A lot more interesting and balanced than the original shove off
if
> you don't like it contributions.
> Also (post my vow of silence) I was dying to add that I didn't like the
> Technosaurus colour scheme either so was interested to see Mike's mail.
> As far as Richard (and Gino for that matter) is concerned, there was
> recently a long silent period on this list. A lot of the technical debate
> including talk of future modules is very welcome, however limiting
> discussion to that and the few 'Grant is God' or  'Wiard is the dogs
> bollocks' contribution seems to reduce this group to the level of a
> propaganda ministry in a dictatorship. Either that or long periods akin to
> the Marie Celeste.
> I don't think it is me who has to 'lighten up', you could have a bit more
> patience with the members who are fascinated by the Wiard system but don't
> necessarily pray at it's alter.
> Finally:
> >try to understand the other animals     and their  stragne blue
synthesizer
> >do not reject the strange blue synthesizer-  listen with it     -follow
it
> > become it
> I didn't realise Eric Cantona was a member.
> Apologies for this comment which will probably only mean something to one
> other member.
> Chris

----------

> bollocks' contribution seems to reduce this group to the level of a
> propaganda ministry in a dictatorship. Either that or long periods akin to
> the Marie Celeste.

I especially liked that last bit! Very witty. :)