Re: [newmellotrongroup] Do you wear a cape when you play your Mellotron?
2013-01-15 by matthew meixner
I wear nothing but a cape. Maybe some socks and this is for live shows. ________________________________ From: lsf5275@aol.com To:
Messages
Browse messages
Page 49 of 376 · 18798 messages matched
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Do you wear a cape when you play your Mellotron?
2013-01-15 by lsf5275@aol.com
I wear a football helmet when I play Mel. Just saying. Frank (Mel Owner) In a message dated 1/15/2013 9:50:51 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, tron400@yahoo.com
Do you wear a cape when you play your Mellotron?
2013-01-15 by tron400
Just wondering. Bernie
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by lsf5275@aol.com
There must have been a couple of years where they were really turning them out. In a message dated 1/14/2013 4:12:02 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by Andy Thompson
From: Mark Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 5:48 AM To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating. Some time
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by Tom Doncourt
#390 here...bought in 73 On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Chris Dale wrote: I need to find out #259. If we all entered our serial numbers on this list at one time,
Re: Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by tron400
#500 has lived its life without proper birthday parties. I would love to finally give it one. Any other history would also be nice to know. For instance, when
RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-14 by Andy
Actually, the LP gets bad press in some quarters. But, name aside, I think it s pretty good. Having used it on the Kracked Earth album, I would challenge
RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-14 by Andy
Or the Voyager XLs replacement FA... Fat Arse! Andy K ... From: Tom Doncourt Sent: 14/01/2013 16:08 To: Subject: Re:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-14 by Tom Doncourt
Hah.. I ve been calling mine an LP too. Wait till the new replacement for the Voyager comes out -the LB (large bootay) On Jan 13, 2013, at 3:58 PM, ClayE
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by Chris Dale
I need to find out #259. If we all entered our serial numbers on this list at one time, we could get a better idea of what still exists and from what eras -
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-14 by lsf5275@aol.com
This was recorded at Gene Stopp s house. He helps maintain the Modular. In a message dated 1/12/2013 2:27:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jandjstrz@verizon.net
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by lsf5275@aol.com
So then my guess would be close. I know that 1541 was purchased in late 1973 or very early in 1974. In a message dated 1/14/2013 12:48:10 A.M. Eastern Standard
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by Mark
Just checked back in the archives of the list, as I remember Martin very kindly looked up #1565 s birthday a few years ago and it was 15th August 1974, Mark
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by john barrick
That was a joke, Tony. We ve seen these build dates and purchase dates fluctuate all over the map, and unless Martin and John can find the list, I don t think
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by Tony
Same here interested, mine’s #510 and been under the impression it was a 1972 build. Don’t think so now after seeing 1407 with a much earlier date
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by Jim Blair
If you have that info, I would certainly be interested. Thanks
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by lsf5275@aol.com
Well, all the digits in the serial number add up to 11, and 1 and 1 is 2. That has to mean something. In a message dated 1/13/2013 7:13:19 P.M. Eastern
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by john barrick
and I think that 1407 was built in 1965. No guess - that s what I think. ... john barrick *Leo got it right the first time* *then he added a second pickup and
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by lsf5275@aol.com
I d like to know. Schultz (M400 #?) In a message dated 1/13/2013 6:58:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, tronbros@aol.com writes: We have the check sheet somewhere
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-13 by Mark
Well I think 1565 was early 73.
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-13 by tronbros
We have the check sheet somewhere in our archive. Do you want me to look it out? Best, M 1963 to 2013 - 50 years of mellotrons mellotronics.com on my iPad
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-13 by lsf5275@aol.com
Let s all guess. I guess 1973-early 1974 at the latest. Frank (assorted mellotrony stuff) In a message dated 1/13/2013 6:41:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-13 by Jim Blair
Just wondering if there s a list out there. I have #1444 at the studio, and would be interested in knowing it s approximate build date. Thanks Jim
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by Hammonddave
I just can t believe that after 40 years they can t design an instrument that improves upon the Mini Moog... Two oscillators? monophonic? 25 keys? Really?
Re: Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by ClayE
I refer to it as an a Moog LP to avoid the crappy name. Clay
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by Andy Kinch
I hate the name Phatty . I m sure Moog could have come up with something better.. IE Prodigy 2 or whatever. Phatty s orrible imo. The synth though is great,
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by Bruce Daily
I saw ELP twice, too. The big Denver arena show in 1977 was truely overblown. I don t remember much, but the pictures help. Another show in the
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by Bruce Daily
Maybe the.....Slimmy ? -Bruce D. ________________________________ From: Mark To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by marabus
Not only is she fantastic but she s blind! Pete
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by fdoddy@aol.com
I didn t say all, I said a lot, but then again, I work in an ageist industry. I like a lot of the youngster s music, just not a lot of the youngsters....even
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-13 by Mark
So this the Moog Sub Phatty?
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by John Wright
Rachel has quite a following on FB. She also plays flute beautifully. John #911 Sent from my iPhone
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by Martin Lopez
Spent a few hours w the new moog last night. Pretty cool machine. Won t be getting rid of my minimoogs or even my phattys for it but...sweet nonetheless.
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by JAMES STRAUSS
Heheh...no kidding Fritz. I cannot stand some of the stuff these kids at work consider music. But then, I m an old foggie to them. I ve saw ELP twice in
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by fdoddy@aol.com
A lot of young people are annoying crap. fritz ... From: JAMES STRAUSS To: newmellotrongroup Sent:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by Chris Dale
Thanks for this Mark. As far as young people in your office go, I wouldn t place too much credence in what they think is good music. Most (but not all) young
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by Mark
I envy anyone who can play that well. I started learning in my mid fifties too late for this time around.
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by JAMES STRAUSS
Pretty cool. I stumbled onto this link from there.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib31-TDH05I This young girl can play ELP. That she is even
Off topic: Next Moog
2013-01-12 by Mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IE-JZPx7qw4 and I quite liked this as well
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: off topic help
2013-01-11 by fdoddy@aol.com
Thanks for the reply. The GSM plugs I ve tried don t seem to be accurate enough. They are merely a series of filters and what-not to simulate the output.
Re: off topic help
2013-01-11 by feline1973
Fritz, see if you can get hold of a GSM compression plugin, so you can degrade the signal as much as the client will be doing, and thus try and find music that
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: The stone girl dances again
2013-01-11 by Mark
Thanks Clay.
Re: The stone girl dances again
2013-01-11 by ClayE
Good stuff. Thanks Mark.
Re: [newmellotrongroup] off topic help
2013-01-10 by fdoddy@aol.com
Thanks to you and Gino! I m getting some more clues. This truly is a vexing problem as I have NEVER had this problem with any of my clients and I believe my
Re: [newmellotrongroup] off topic help
2013-01-10 by Bruce Daily
Oops, I forgot to mention, that 4KHz is also the theoretical upper limit of the 8KHz sample rate. Anything above 3-4KHz is useless info, and may
Re: [newmellotrongroup] off topic help
2013-01-10 by Bruce Daily
Hi Fritz- Gino may be thinking what I was thinking. EQ it first, with a bandpass between 300 Hz and 4 KHz (close to landline response). This keeps
Re: [newmellotrongroup] off topic help
2013-01-10 by gino wong
This stuff can be hard. If it were analog I would go 250 nanowebers to forstall any chance of distortion. I haven’t been in this specific situation but. I
Re: [newmellotrongroup] off topic help
2013-01-10 by fdoddy@aol.com
sorry for the typo..it s u-law... fritz ... From: fdoddy To: newmellotrongroup Sent: Thu, Jan 10, 2013
Re: [newmellotrongroup] The stone girl dances again
2013-01-10 by Mark Pring
Thanks Bruce, it s one of my favourites. ________________________________ From: Bruce Daily To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com