MOTM

Test image for MOTM-101. Comments?

Thanks to Moe for the mock-up.

Paul S.

looks great! How does this
one differ than 1st rev ?
Whats the ETA Paul ?
Ringo

Paul Schreiber wrote:

>
> Test image for MOTM-101. Comments?
>
> Thanks to Moe for the mock-up.
>
> Paul S.
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                     Name: m101-4.jpg
>    m101-4.jpg       Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
>                 Encoding: base64

In a message dated 00-09-20 18:10:20 EDT, you write:

<< Test image for MOTM-101. Comments? >>


paul,
looks very nice. any chance of getting a random trigger out jack to go along 
with the random voltage out ? i see a nice spot for it there on the faceplate 
where you are a jack short.
best,
dave v.

>
>
> paul,
> looks very nice. any chance of getting a random trigger out jack to go
along
> with the random voltage out ? i see a nice spot for it there on the
faceplate
> where you are a jack short.

You'll be able to do this with a future module :)

Paul S.

You can see the old one on the website.

My goal is shipping Nov. 1st. The delay is waiting for the next batch of
1200 pots to arrive.

Paul S.

----- Original Message -----
From: <weld@...>
To: <motm@egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-101 Mock-up


>
> looks great! How does this
> one differ than 1st rev ?
> Whats the ETA Paul ?
> Ringo
>
> Paul Schreiber wrote:
>
> >
> > Test image for MOTM-101. Comments?
> >
> > Thanks to Moe for the mock-up.
> >
> > Paul S.
> >
>
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> >
> >                     Name: m101-4.jpg
> >    m101-4.jpg       Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
> >                 Encoding: base64
>
>
>
>
>
>

In a message dated 00-09-20 21:52:17 EDT, you write:

<< You'll be able to do this with a future module :)
  >>


paul,
cool. thanks.
best,
dave v.

Paul Schreiber wrote:

> > paul,
> > looks very nice. any chance of getting a random trigger out jack to go
> along
> > with the random voltage out ? i see a nice spot for it there on the
> faceplate
> > where you are a jack short.
> 
> You'll be able to do this with a future module :)
> 
Hmm. I always wanted a clock out in that empty space.

Personally, if the second switch is related to Vibrato, I would slide it
down next to the Vibrato knob. Gives more finger space in back, too.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...] 
Sent:	Wednesday, 20 September, 2000 6:15 PM
To:	MOTM listserv
Subject:	[motm] MOTM-101 Mock-up


Test image for MOTM-101. Comments?

Thanks to Moe for the mock-up.

Paul S.

Paul,
Looks like a nice, very useable unit - one to add to my list of
future inclusions.


> Personally, if the second switch is related to Vibrato, I would slide it
> down next to the Vibrato knob. Gives more finger space in back, too.
> 
I agree here, the association of the two is more intuitive.

One possible addition: Because there is a space for at least one more
jack, how about vc of slew?  If this space will be taken by a different
jack (e.g., random trigger jack was mentioned), could another jack or two
be located above white or pink jacks?  I know this would negate Tkacs good
suggestion about the VIB SRC switch, but it would enhance the versatility
of the module (which I thought was the main goal of modulars).

Anyway, another $.02 to confound your day,
Jeff

It's too close to  the jacks. Tried that.

Paul S.

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@...>
To: <motm@egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 7:15 AM
Subject: RE: [motm] MOTM-101 Mock-up


> 
> 
> Personally, if the second switch is related to Vibrato, I would slide it
> down next to the Vibrato knob. Gives more finger space in back, too.
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 September, 2000 6:15 PM
> To: MOTM listserv
> Subject: [motm] MOTM-101 Mock-up
> 
> 
> Test image for MOTM-101. Comments?
> 
> Thanks to Moe for the mock-up.
> 
> Paul S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

In a message dated 00-09-20 22:16:46 EDT, you write:

<< Hmm. I always wanted a clock out in that empty space. >>


thomas,
well, i wasn`t so much thinking of a "clock out" per se but more of a trigger 
output that would produce a trigger when then random voltage level changed 
state.
still, we`ll have to see what paul has in store for the future.
best,
dave v.

On Thursday, September 21, 2000, at 07:47 PM, davevosh@... wrote:
> In a message dated 00-09-20 22:16:46 EDT, you write: 
>  
> << Hmm. I always wanted a clock out in that empty space. >> 
>    
> thomas, 
> well, i wasn`t so much thinking of a "clock out" per se but more of a trigger  
> output that would produce a trigger when then random voltage level changed  
> state. 
> still, we`ll have to see what paul has in store for the future. 

Yeah, it's just that I always end up using a 320 to clock the sample hold
just so I can have other things triggering off the same clock. 

Reminds me that I have been having some fun lately with noise
as a trigger source. Changing the level changes the rate of triggers.
I even got close to the Edgar Winter thing in Frankenstein.
Anyone know that exact patch?

Tomy