If you're building MOTM modules, buyers would expect the MOTM standard pots, though I don't doubt that popular modules would sell with Alphas. You would probably have to discount them and be very specific when selling them.
If you're building MOTM *format* modules like those at Bridechamber, then the buyer would likely expect that Alphas were used.
cheers,
eric f
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, jfm3@... <jfm3@...> wrote:
From: jfm3@jfm3.org <jfm3@...>
Subject: Re: [motm] Question about building/selling MOTM modules
To: argitoth@..., motm@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 12:39 PM
The market for MOTM modules is too small to generate a meaningful
answer to this question.
Build your modules as best you can. Replacing a pot or four is not
too hard to do down the road. Replacing 100 pots in a large modular
is. Whether or not to spend an extra $60 in parts in exchange for a
*brick and rebar* shithouse is a judgement call everyone will make
differently.
IMO modulars should be designed for a 100 year duty cycle. I also buy
used modules assembled by amateurs (like myself) that have unsealed
pots. Such is war.Show quoted textHide quoted text
>>>>> Argitoth <argitoth@gmail. com> writes:
> This is a question about selling modules that aren't 100% MOTM
> standard. If I use pots supplied by Bridechamber instead of the BTI
> pots supplied by Paul, will I have a harder time selling the
> modules?