MOTM

Please visit:

www.synthtech.com/catalog

and in the upper left corner, new items will appear. Also, I've updated the News 
page.

I know there are few pictures (ran out of time), I will add these over then next 
few days. If I made any typos, please email me. Yes, some CEM/SSM prices went 
up, but some went down. The numbers you see loading into the cart are ALL THAT I 
HAVE. Unless I can scrounge more. I spent 4 hours combing all my storage bins 
looking for strays (I found about 10 ICs I didn't know I had, like a CEM3371). 
And you don't have to mess with PayPal unless to want to :)

If you get a message about the site/SSL being unsecured, that is WRONG and 
UNIX/Solaris is to blame. Will yell at India Tech Support tonight about tit.

I will make more updates, but I've been typing since 7AM and I'm hungry.

Paul S.
BBQ to the rescue!!

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
>
> Please visit:
> 
> www.synthtech.com/catalog

From the lower right:

Who's Online
There currently are 47 guests and 
4 members online.

Looks like you've got a winner. :-)

Ben

On 2/1/07, Paul Schreiber put forth:
>
>  Will yell at India Tech Support tonight about tit.

While I'm sure that's a typo, the question is whether he added an
extra "t" or left off an "s" ;)

Hey All -

I've noticed the quad LFO is no longer available.  I hate to stir up 
another "this module is a must" sort of thread, but I have to say 
that this one in particular *always* gets used in a patch.  It's 
REALLY COOL to take the summed out of the four LFOs into a mod input 
and play with each LFO's rate.  Truly a humanizer and can also make 
things pretty wild and adds to stochastic patches nicely.

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "benstuyts" <ben@...> wrote:

>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@> wrote:
> >
> > Please visit:
> > 
> > www.synthtech.com/catalog
> 
> From the lower right:
> 
> Who's Online
> There currently are 47 guests and 
> 4 members online.
> 
> Looks like you've got a winner. :-)
> 
> Ben
>

Hey Mike,

Paul announced quite a while ago that the MOTM-380 was to be 
discontinued.  Which is why I bought a second one during the big kit 
sale.  Admittedly, it's a module with special appeal to folks who throw 
the word 'stochastic' into casually conversation :).

Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix.com

Mike Marsh wrote:

> Hey All -
>
> I've noticed the quad LFO is no longer available.  I hate to stir up 
> another "this module is a must" sort of thread, but I have to say 
> that this one in particular *always* gets used in a patch.  It's 
> REALLY COOL to take the summed out of the four LFOs into a mod input 
> and play with each LFO's rate.  Truly a humanizer and can also make 
> things pretty wild and adds to stochastic patches nicely.
>
> Mike
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "benstuyts" <ben@...> wrote:
>   
>> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@> wrote:
>>     
>>> Please visit:
>>>
>>> www.synthtech.com/catalog
>>>       
>> From the lower right:
>>
>> Who's Online
>> There currently are 47 guests and 
>> 4 members online.
>>
>> Looks like you've got a winner. :-)
>>
>> Ben
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

*sheepish grin* I guess that shows my biology background :) 

Two would be good to have, I only have one.  But I have plenty of 
other LFO sources so it's not too bad.  I'm (im)patiently awaiting 
MOTM 2.0...

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>
> Hey Mike,
> 
> Paul announced quite a while ago that the MOTM-380 was to be 
> discontinued.  Which is why I bought a second one during the big 
kit 
> sale.  Admittedly, it's a module with special appeal to folks who 
throw 
> the word 'stochastic' into casually conversation :).
> 
> Richard Brewster
> http://www.pugix.com
> 
> Mike Marsh wrote:
> > Hey All -
> >
> > I've noticed the quad LFO is no longer available.  I hate to stir 
up 
> > another "this module is a must" sort of thread, but I have to say 
> > that this one in particular *always* gets used in a patch.  It's 
> > REALLY COOL to take the summed out of the four LFOs into a mod 
input 
> > and play with each LFO's rate.  Truly a humanizer and can also 
make 

> > things pretty wild and adds to stochastic patches nicely.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "benstuyts" <ben@> wrote:
> >   
> >> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@> wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Please visit:
> >>>
> >>> www.synthtech.com/catalog
> >>>       
> >> From the lower right:
> >>
> >> Who's Online
> >> There currently are 47 guests and 
> >> 4 members online.
> >>
> >> Looks like you've got a winner. :-)
> >>
> >> Ben
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

At 01:47 PM 2/3/2007, Mike Marsh wrote:

>*sheepish grin* I guess that shows my biology background :)

Oh, I thought that you did high-end pre-press work. ;-)


>Two would be good to have, I only have one.  But I have plenty of
>other LFO sources so it's not too bad....

I missed out on that one, too, as I opted to get the other 2 LFOs 
during the kit closeout.

The good thing is that it's not a hard module to duplicate. Plain 
(non-VC) LFOs are simple to build, and so is a summing amp (mixer). 
But you knew that already. :-) Of course, there's always the front 
panel issue to deal with.

A 4 x 4 matrix mixer would be nice to have for this. 4 LFOs go in, 4 
complex signals come out. Mixer controls that could attenuate and 
invert would be great in this application. Just a thought.
--
john

Hey John -

Have you seen Ken Stone's little mixer?  Super easy to build (coming 
from a complete goof at this DIY stuff) and it has 6 ins.  You could 
put one together for cheap and add LFOs as you suggested.  And throw in 
a random source, too, just for the heck of it!

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, John Mahoney <jmahoney@...> wrote:

>
> ...
>
> A 4 x 4 matrix mixer would be nice to have for this. 4 LFOs go in, 4 
> complex signals come out. Mixer controls that could attenuate and 
> invert would be great in this application. Just a thought.
> --
> john
>

At 04:11 PM 2/3/2007, Mike Marsh wrote:
>Hey John -
>
>Have you seen Ken Stone's little mixer?  Super easy to build (coming
>from a complete goof at this DIY stuff) and it has 6 ins.  You could
>put one together for cheap and add LFOs as you suggested.  And throw in
>a random source, too, just for the heck of it!

Yes, that would be perfect, it even has bi-polar mixing. Good idea on 
using a random source or 2, as well (one plain and one 
slew-limited?). Ken makes a board for almost every idea that I come 
up with; Ken modestly says that he feels the same way about Serge 
(i.e. all his ideas were previously done by Serge).

No need to stay a complete DIY goof, as long as you know which end of 
a soldering iron to hold. ;-)
--
john

Ken modestly says that he feels the same way about Serge 
> (i.e. all his ideas were previously done by Serge).
>

Good thing I don't have that problem :)

Paul S.

At 05:02 PM 2/3/2007, Paul Schreiber wrote:
>Ken modestly says that he feels the same way about Serge
>>(i.e. all his ideas were previously done by Serge).
>
>Good thing I don't have that problem :)

What... modesty? ;-)
[ducks]
--
john

John Mahoney wrote:

> What... modesty? ;-)

Haha.

> John Mahoney wrote:
> 
>> What... modesty? ;-)
> 
> Haha.


That, too (and the same for Jay over there).

Paul S.
>

>At 05:02 PM 2/3/2007, Paul Schreiber wrote:
>>Ken modestly says that he feels the same way about Serge
>>>(i.e. all his ideas were previously done by Serge).
>>
>  >Good thing I don't have that problem :)
>
>What... modesty? ;-)
>[ducks]

no, paul missed out that all his ideas were previously done by Dave1, 
Dave2, Bob, Katoh, etc...

;-)